7 C.F.R. § 278.8

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1983–2001 · leading case: Ameira Corp. v. Veneman, 169 F. Supp. 2d 432 (M.D.N.C. 2001).
Ameira Corp. v. Veneman, 169 F. Supp. 2d 432 (M.D.N.C. 2001). · cites it 3× “§ 2023 (a)(18), 7 C.F.R. § 278.8 (a), and 7 C.F .R. § 279.”
TRM, Inc. v. United States, 52 F.3d 941 (11th Cir. 1995). “See 7 C.F.R. §§ 278.8 , 279.5, 279.6, 279.7. Such review may include an appearance in front of the ARO, as well as the submission of any information in support of the store’s position.”
Grand Union Co. v. United States, 696 F.2d 888 (11th Cir. 1983). “Grand Union obtained review pursuant to 7 C.F.R. § 278.8 (1979), which provides that a food retailer, such as Grand Union, “aggrieved by administrative action under .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.