C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER II—FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER C—SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE AND FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM › PART 279—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW—FOOD RETAILERS AND FOOD WHOLESALERS › Subpart A—Administrative Review

7 C.F.R. § 279.3

Content of request for review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Identifying the request. Requests for review shall clearly identify the administrative action from which the review is requested. This identification shall include the date of the letter or other written communication notifying the firm of the administrative action, the name and title of the person who signed the letter or other communication, and whether the action under appeal concerns a denial of an application or a withdrawal of authorization to participate, a disqualification from further participation, a civil money penalty, or a denial of all or any part of a claim or a fine.

(b) Supporting the request. The request shall include information in support of the request showing the grounds on which review is being sought, or shall state that supporting information will be filed in writing at a later date. In the latter case, the designated reviewer shall notify the firm of the date by which the information must be filed.

[Amdt. 136, 43 FR 43279, Sept. 22, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 236, 49 FR 22058, May 25, 1984; Amdt. 334, 57 FR 3913, Feb. 3, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 68 FR 41053, July 10, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: Aiman Ghattas, Doing Bus. as a & M Food Shop v. United States of Am. Michael Espy, Sec'y of Agric., 40 F.3d 281 (8th Cir. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Aiman Ghattas, Doing Bus. as a & M Food Shop v. United States of Am. Michael Espy, Sec'y of Agric., 40 F.3d 281 (8th Cir. 1994). “See 7 C.F.R. § 279.3 (b). The regulations regarding requests for review do not appear to limit the issues the aggrieved store owner may raise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.