C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER I—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (STANDARDS, INSPECTIONS, MARKETING PRACTICES), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER B—MARKETING OF PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES › PART 46—REQUIREMENTS (OTHER THAN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES) UNDER THE PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930

7 C.F.R. § 46.1

Words in singular form

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Words in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2022 · leading case: Debruyn Produce Co. v. Richmond Produce Co. (In Re Richmond Produce Co.), 112 B.R. 364 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Debruyn Produce Co. v. Richmond Produce Co. (In Re Richmond Produce Co.), 112 B.R. 364 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1990). · cites it 2× “Consequently, the court is faced with a series of related disputes between the Bank, on the one hand, and a PACA claimant, on the other, as to whether the claimant’s trust fund claim has been preserved in accordance with the requirements of PACA and regulations thereunder, 7 CFR…”
Anic, Inc. v. Chipwich, Inc. (In Re Chipwich, Inc.), 165 B.R. 135 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994). · cites it 2× “PACA and the regulations thereunder, 7 C.F.R. §§ 46.1 et seq., set forth the procedural steps which a PACA claimant must follow to preserve its trust benefits.”
S. Katzman Produce Inc. v. Abraham Produce Corp. (S.D.N.Y. 2022). “(“PACA”) and the Code of Federal Regulations implementing the PACA promulgated by the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), 7 C.F.R. § 46.1 , et seq., and I am authorized to make this Declaration and am competent to testify at trial, if necessary,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.