C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER I—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (STANDARDS, INSPECTIONS, MARKETING PRACTICES), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › SUBCHAPTER B—MARKETING OF PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES › PART 46—REQUIREMENTS (OTHER THAN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES) UNDER THE PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930

7 C.F.R. § 46.24

Records of retailers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding the specific records and documents prescribed in the foregoing sections, licensees who purchase produce solely for sale at retail shall establish and maintain accounts and records, adapted to their type of operations, which will fully and correctly disclose all transactions relating to the purchase of produce. Such accounts and records should include the date of receipt of each lot, kind of produce, number of packages and quantity, price paid, evidence of agreement, or contract of purchase, bills of lading, paid bills, and any other documents relating to the purchase of produce.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1949–1950 · leading case: California Fruit Exch. v. Henry, 89 F. Supp. 580 (W.D. Pa. 1950).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
California Fruit Exch. v. Henry, 89 F. Supp. 580 (W.D. Pa. 1950). · cites it 2× “* * * means that the produce quoted or sold is to be placed free on board the boat, car, or other agency of the through land transportation at shipping point, in suitable shipping condition * * * and that the buyer assumes all risk of damage and delay in transit not caused by…”
Alexander Mktg. Co. v. Harrisburg Daily Mkt., 87 F. Supp. 124 (M.D. Penn. 1949). · cites it 2× “…Company. . Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. Berman, D.C.W.D.N.Y.1934, 8 F.Supp. 60 . . 7 U.S.C.A. § 499o. . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(i). . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(j).”
— 7 C.F.R. § 46.24(i) — 2 cases
California Fruit Exch. v. Henry, 89 F. Supp. 580 (W.D. Pa. 1950). “* * * means that the produce quoted or sold is to be placed free on board the boat, car, or other agency of the through land transportation at shipping point, in suitable shipping condition * * * and that the buyer assumes all risk of damage and delay in transit not caused by…”
Alexander Mktg. Co. v. Harrisburg Daily Mkt., 87 F. Supp. 124 (M.D. Penn. 1949). “…Company. . Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. Berman, D.C.W.D.N.Y.1934, 8 F.Supp. 60 . . 7 U.S.C.A. § 499o. . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(i). . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(j).”
— 7 C.F.R. § 46.24(j) — 2 cases
California Fruit Exch. v. Henry, 89 F. Supp. 580 (W.D. Pa. 1950). “* * * means that the produce quoted or sold is to be placed free on board the boat, car, or other agency of the through land transportation at shipping point, in suitable shipping condition * * * and that the buyer assumes all risk of damage and delay in transit not caused by…”
Alexander Mktg. Co. v. Harrisburg Daily Mkt., 87 F. Supp. 124 (M.D. Penn. 1949). “…Company. . Barker-Miller Distributing Co. v. Berman, D.C.W.D.N.Y.1934, 8 F.Supp. 60 . . 7 U.S.C.A. § 499o. . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(i). . 7 C.F.R. 46.24(j).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.