7 C.F.R. § 770.1
Purpose
This part contains the Agency's policies and procedures for making and servicing loans to assist a Native American tribe or tribal corporation with the acquisition of land interests within the tribal reservation or Alaskan community.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1983–1990 · leading case: Matter of Sunberg, 35 B.R. 777 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa 1983).
Matter of Sunberg, 35 B.R. 777 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa 1983). “1477 (1983) (to be codified at 7 CFR § 770.1 -.6). The rules describe how the program will operate, its purpose, the obligations of the operator and producer and the obligations of the U.”
Gibson v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 6 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “Under the PIK program, a farmer 1 entered into a contract with the Department of Agriculture, through the CCC, in which the farmer agreed to reduce (set-aside) the acreage he normally planted in a commodity designated in 7 C.F.R. § 770.1 (b) (corn was so designated in said…”
Rainier Nat'l Bank v. Bachmann, 757 P.2d 979 (Wash. 1988). “7 C.F.R. § 770.1 (a) (1984). Broadly stated, the intent of the PIK program was acreage reduction and land diversion.”
In Re Dwayne Sunberg, Patricia Sunberg, Engaged in Farming, Debtors, 729 F.2d 561 (8th Cir. 1984). “1476, 9232 (1983) (to be codified at 7 C.F.R. §§ 770.1 -.6). The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) of the USDA approved these contracts on March 16, 1983.”
In Re Scotty Lee Schneider & Anna Lucille Schneider, Debtors. Scotty Lee Schneider & Anna Lucille Schneider v. Edward J. Nazar, Tr., 864 F.2d 683 (10th Cir. 1988). “7 C.F.R. § 770.1 (a) (1985) provided: (a) The Department of Agriculture, through the Commodity Credit Corporation, will enter into contracts with operators and producers who agree to reduce the acreage normally planted to a commodity specified in § 770.”
In Re Kruse, 35 B.R. 958 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1983). “) In addition, the debtors are probably eligible for land diversion payments as follows: [[Image here]] The PIK regulations will be codified at 7 CFR 770.1 to 770.6. At present, they can be found at 48 Fed.”
Grav v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 390 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “” 7 CFR § 770.1 (1983). This regulation is similar to the statute in question here and the court’s analysis in Haupricht is equally applicable here.”
Raines v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 530 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “7 C.F.R. § 770.1 (a) (1984) (first published in 48 Fed.”
In Re Schmidt, 38 B.R. 380 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1984). “9232 (1983) (to be codified at 7 CFR § 770.1 -.6). The Debtor in this instance contracted to divert 152 acres which normally would have been planted in corn.”
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. of Blackwell v. Case (In Re George), 85 B.R. 133 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1988). “7 C.F.R. 770.1(a)(1984). However, in the Food Security Act of 1985 Congress authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to use government owned commodities and “negotiable” certificates redeemable in a commodity owned by the C.”
Haupricht Bros. v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 369 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “The new 7 C.F.R. § 770.1 stated in part as follows: The Department of Agriculture will enter into contracts with operators and producers who agree to devote acreage normally planted to wheat, corn, grain sorghum, upland cotton or rice to a conserving use in return for…”
In Re Clark, 82 B.R. 131 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1987). “7 C.F.R. § 770.1 et seq. governs commodity certificates and payments in kind of all programs administered by the CCC or the ASCS.”
— 7 C.F.R. § 770.1(a)(1984) — 1 case
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. of Blackwell v. Case (In Re George), 85 B.R. 133 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1988). “7 C.F.R. 770.1(a)(1984). However, in the Food Security Act of 1985 Congress authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to use government owned commodities and “negotiable” certificates redeemable in a commodity owned by the C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.