C.F.R. » Title 7 » CHAPTER IX—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE (MARKETING AGREEMENTS AND ORDERS; FRUITS, VEGETABLES, NUTS), DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE › PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA › Subpart A—Order Regulating Handling

7 C.F.R. § 981.13

Handler

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Handler means any person handling almonds during any crop year, except that such term shall not include either a grower who sells only almonds of his own production at retail at a roadside stand operated by him, or a person receiving almonds from growers and other persons and delivering these almonds to a handler.

[41 FR 26852, June 30, 1976]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1990–2009 · leading case: Koretoff v. Vilsack, 601 F. Supp. 2d 238 (D.D.C. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Koretoff v. Vilsack, 601 F. Supp. 2d 238 (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 608c(1), see also 7 C.F.R. §§ 981.13 , 981.16 (defining “handler” and “to handle” for purposes of the California almond market).”
Vito Balice, Individually & as the Agent of O. R. C. Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., Opinion, 203 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. 2000). “See 7 C.F.R. § 981.13 (1987). As handlers of California almonds, they were subject to regulation under both the AMAA and the Almond Marketing Order.”
Evans v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 554 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 7 C.F.R. § 981.13 (excluding from the definition of handlers any producer who makes such roadside sales).”
Saulsbury Orchards & Almond Processing, Inc. v. Yeutter, 917 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1990). “Because Saulsbury Orchards (“Saulsbury”) fits within the Act’s definition of an almond handler, see 7 C.F.R. §§ 981.13 , 981.16, it is subject to the mandates of this order.”
Koretoff v. Vilsack, 626 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 608c(13), unequivocally proscribes regulation of any almond retailer in its retail capacity; and (2) the Almond Order, by 7 C.F.R. § 981.13 , and interpretive rules in § 981.”
Koretoff v. Schaefer (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 608c(13), unequivocally proscribes regulation of any almond retailer in its retail capacity; and (2) the Almond Order, by 7 C.F.R. § 981.13 , and interpretive rules in § 981.”
Koretoff v. Schaefer (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 608c(1), see also 7 C.F.R. §§ 981.13 , 981.16 (defining “handler” and “to handle” for purposes of the California almond market).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.