8 C.F.R. § 100.1
Introduction
The following components have been delegated authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to administer and enforce certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act and all other laws relating to immigration: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2014–2024 · leading case: Adrian Da Costa v. Immigr. Inv. Prog. Off., 80 F.4th 330 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
Adrian Da Costa v. Immigr. Inv. Prog. Off., 80 F.4th 330 (D.C. Cir. 2023). “USCIS processes petitions, 8 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 , 103.2, 106.1, while the 5 State Department tracks visa availability, allocates visas, and, for visa-seekers residing outside the United States, issues visas through its embassies and consulates worldwide to persons USCIS determines…”
Nancy Huisha-Huisha v. Alejandro Mayorkas, 27 F.4th 718 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “See 8 C.F.R. § 100.1 . 23 excluded from asylum aliens with communicable diseases.”
Bianka M. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., 423 P.3d 334 (Cal. 2018). “§ 1101 (a)(27)(J)(iii) [requiring DHS's consent to SIJ classification]; 8 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 (2009) [delegating authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.”
Prince Adjei v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 763 S.E.2d 225 (Va. Ct. App. 2014). “8 C.F.R. § 100.1 . This federal agency “has jurisdiction to adjudicate an application for adjustment of status filed by any alien.”
Naiker v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigr. Servs., 352 F. Supp. 3d 1067 (W.D. Wash. 2018). “8 C.F.R. § 100.1 . The USCIS' investigation includes identifying fraudulent marriages entered into for the purpose of evading immigration laws.”
Delaware Valley Reg'l Ctr., LLC v. DHS, 106 F.4th 1195 (D.C. Cir. 2024). “See 8 C.F.R. §§ 100.1 , 103.2, 254.2(a). The State Department determines how many visas are available and 4 allocates visas to approved applicants.”
Mohammad Poursina v. Uscis (9th Cir. 2019). “See 8 C.F.R. § 100.1 ; id. § 204.5; see also Zhu v.”
Freedom Watch, Inc. v. McAleenan (D.D.C. 2020). “Customs and Border Protection (“CPB”), ICE, and USCIS, which are “to administer and enforce certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act and all other laws relating to immigration.”
Guardianship of Hernandez CA2/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 1101 (a)(27)(J)(iii), 8 C.F.R. § 100.1 (2009), 8 C.F.R. § 103.2 (a)(7)(i) (2016).”
Rasool v. Mayorkas (D.D.C. 2021). “See 8 C.F.R. § 100.1 et seq. (explaining that USCIS has “been delegated authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to administer and enforce certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act and all other laws relating to immigration”); see also id.”
Pak (BIA 2020). “8 C.F.R. § 100.1 (2020). 116 Cite as 28 I&N Dec.”
Patel v. Garland (D.D.C. 2022). “As Defendants note, however, DHS has delegated authority to USCIS, see 8 C.F.R. § 100.1 , and Plaintiff does not challenge the propriety of that delegation, nor does his suit attack DHS policy generally.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.