8 C.F.R. § 1292.6

Interpretation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Interpretations of §§ 1292.1 through 1292.6 will be made by the Board, subject to the provisions of part 1003 of this chapter. Interpretations of §§ 1292.11 through 1292.20 will be made by the Assistant Director for Policy (or the Assistant Director for Policy's delegate) or the Director.

[81 FR 92367, Dec. 19, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 44542, Aug. 26, 2019; 85 FR 69482, Nov. 3, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Davila v. Lang, 343 F. Supp. 3d 254 (S.D. Ill. 2018).
Davila v. Lang, 343 F. Supp. 3d 254 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “The regulations governing non-attorney accreditation are ample and do not leave room for states to weigh in on the review procedures for accreditation candidates. Because the accreditation rules were promulgated by proper exercise of agency authority, state laws have no bearing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.