8 C.F.R. § 214.5

Libyan and third country nationals acting on behalf of Libyan entities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the nonimmigrant status of any Libyan national, or of any other foreign national acting on behalf of a Libyan entity, who is engaging in aviation maintenance, flight operations, or nuclear-related studies or training is terminated.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the following benefits will not be available to any Libyan national or any other foreign national acting on behalf of a Libyan entity where the purpose is to engage in, or seek to obtain aviation maintenance, flight operations or nuclear-related studies or training:

(1) Application for school transfer.

(2) Application for extension of stay.

(3) Employment authorization or practical training.

(4) Request for reinstatement of student status.

(5) Application for change of nonimmigrant status.

(Secs. 103, 212, 214, 248; 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1182, 1184, 1258) [48 FR 10297, Mar. 3, 1983]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1979–2008 · leading case: Narenji v. Civiletti, 481 F. Supp. 1132 (D.D.C. 1979).
Narenji v. Civiletti, 481 F. Supp. 1132 (D.D.C. 1979). · cites it 11× “The Court is asked to determine whether 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 , reprinted in 44 Fed.Reg.”
Hamid Shoaee v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 704 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. 1983). · cites it 3× “After the Iranian seizure of the United States Embassy in Teheran, the Attorney General promulgated 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 , requiring every Iranian student in the United States to report to the INS.”
Diouf v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2008). “See 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 (b). Therefore, we reject the Government’s suggestion that Diouf was statutorily ineligible for release on bond.”
Gholamreza Narenji, Behzad Vahedi, Cyrus Vahidnia v. Benjamin Civiletti, Attorney Gen., Confederation of Iranian Students v. Benjamin R. Civiletti, 617 F.2d 745 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “In the circumstances of this case the court has concluded that the challenged regulation, 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 , issued November 13, 1979, must be sustained.”
Abolghasen Osee Yassini, & Masoud Mahdjoubi v. David Crosland, Acting Comm'r, Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 618 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1980). “On November 13 the Attorney General issued a regulation, 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 , requiring Iranian students to report within 30 days to their local INS office to provide information relevant to their immigration status.”
Tayyari v. New Mexico State Univ., 495 F. Supp. 1365 (D.N.M. 1980). “The Attorney General, at the direction of the President, promulgated a regulation, 8 C.F.R. Section 214.5 (November 14, 1979), requiring all nonimmigrant alien post-secondary school students from Iran to report to INS for the purpose of validating their student visas.”
Malek Abdullah Malek-Marzban & Badry Malek-Marzban v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 653 F.2d 113 (4th Cir. 1981). “On November 13, 1979, he promulgated 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 , which requires all Iranian post-secondary school students to report to a local INS officer or campus representative and provide information about their residences and the maintenance of their nonimmigrant status.”
Akbari v. Godshall, 524 F. Supp. 635 (D. Colo. 1981). · cites it 3× “See 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 (1981). Akbari complied with this order on December 10, 1979.”
Nezam Tooloee v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 722 F.2d 1434 (9th Cir. 1983). “The regulation was promulgated in response to the Iranian hostage crisis.”
Abdolreza Shahla v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 749 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1984). “1979) (upholding the constitutionality of an Iranian regulation ( 8 C.F.R. § 214.5 (1980)) where the attorney general attested that the regulation was a "fundamental element in the President’s efforts to resolve the Iranian crisis and to maintain the safety of American hostages…”
Yazdani, 17 I. & N. Dec. 626 (BIA 1981). “In December 1979, the respondent reported to the Service's San Francisco office pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 214.5. These deportation proceed- ings were thereafter instituted by the issuance of an Order to Show Cause charging the respondent with deportability for having violated the…”
Esmaeil Torabpour v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 694 F.2d 1119 (8th Cir. 1982). “8 C.F.R. § 214.5 (1981) ordered all F-l and J-l nonimmigrant Iranian students in the United States to report to a district office of the I&NS and provide information as to current residence and maintenance of nonimmigrant status.”
— 8 C.F.R. § 214.5(a) — 1 case
Sedghi, 17 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1980).
— 8 C.F.R. § 214.5(a)(1979) — 1 case
Sedghi, 17 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1980).
— 8 C.F.R. § 214.5(h) — 1 case
Sedghi, 17 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1980).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.