8 C.F.R. § 245.2

Application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General—(1) Jurisdiction. USCIS has jurisdiction to adjudicate an application for adjustment of status filed by any alien, unless the immigration judge has jurisdiction to adjudicate the application under 8 CFR 1245.2(a)(1).

(2) Proper filing of application—(i) Under section 245. (A) An immigrant visa must be immediately available in order for an alien to properly file an adjustment application under section 245 of the Act See § 245.1(g)(1) to determine whether an immigrant visa is immediately available.

(B) If, at the time of filing, approval of a visa petition filed for classification under section 201(b)(2)(A)(i), section 203(a) or section 203(b)(1), (2) or (3) of the Act would make a visa immediately available to the alien beneficiary, the alien beneficiary's adjustment application will be considered properly filed whether submitted concurrently with or subsequent to the visa petition, provided that it meets the filing requirements contained in parts 103 and 245. For any other classification, the alien beneficiary may file the adjustment application only after the Service has approved the visa petition.

(C) A visa petition and an adjustment application are concurrently filed only if:

(1) The visa petitioner and adjustment applicant each file their respective form at the same time, bundled together within a single mailer or delivery packet, with the proper filing fees on the same day and at the same Service office, or;

(2) the visa petitioner filed the visa petition, for which a visa number has become immediately available, on, before or after July 31, 2002, and the adjustment applicant files the adjustment application, together with the proper filing fee and a copy of the Form I-797, Notice of Action, establishing the receipt and acceptance by the Service of the underlying Form I-140 visa petition, at the same Service office at which the visa petitioner filed the visa petition, or;

(3) The visa petitioner filed the visa petition, for which a visa number has become immediately available, on, before, or after July 31, 2002, and the adjustment applicant files the adjustment application, together with proof of payment of the filing fee with the Service and a copy of the Form I-797 Notice of Action establishing the receipt and acceptance by the Service of the underlying Form I-140 visa petition, with the Immigration Court or the Board of Immigration Appeals when jurisdiction lies under paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(ii) Under the Act of November 2, 1966. An application for the benefits of section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1966 is not properly filed unless the applicant was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States subsequent to January 1, 1959. An applicant is ineligible for the benefits of the Act of November 2, 1966 unless he or she has been physically present in the United States for one year (amended from two years by the Refugee Act of 1980).

(3) Submission of documents—(i) General. A separate application shall be filed by each applicant for benefits under section 245, or the Act of November 2, 1966. Each application shall be accompanied by an executed Form G-325A, if the applicant has reached his or her 14th birthday. Form G-325A shall be considered part of the application. An application under this part shall be accompanied by the document specified in the instructions which are attached to the application.

(ii) Under section 245. An application for adjustment of status is submitted on Form I-485, Application for Permanent Residence. The application must be accompanied by the appropriate fee as explained in the instructions to the application.

(iii) Under section 245(i). An alien who seeks adjustment of status under the provisions of section 245(i) of the Act must file Form I-485, with the required fee. The alien must also file Supplement A to Form I-485, with any required additional sum.

(iv) Under the Act of November 2, 1966. An application for adjustment of status is made on Form I-485A. The application must be accompanied by Form I-643, Health and Human Services Statistical Data Sheet. The application must include a clearance from the local police jurisdiction for any area in the United States when the applicant has lived for six months or more since his or her 14th birthday.

(4) Effect of departure—(i) General. The effect of a departure from the United States is dependent upon the law under which the applicant is applying for adjustment.

(ii) Under section 245 of the Act. (A) The departure from the United States of an applicant who is under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings shall be deemed an abandonment of the application constituting grounds for termination of the proceeding by reason of the departure. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(B) and (C) of this section, the departure of an applicant who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings shall be deemed an abandonment of the application constituting grounds for termination of any pending application for adjustment of status, unless the applicant was previously granted advance parole by the Service for such absences, and was inspected upon returning to the United States. If the adjustment application of an individual granted advance parole is subsequently denied the individual will be treated as an applicant for admission, and subject to the provisions of section 212 and 235 of the Act.

(B) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if he or she was previously granted advance parole by the Service for such absences, and was inspected and paroled upon returning to the United States. If the adjustment of status application of such individual is subsequently denied, he or she will be treated as an applicant for admission, and subject to the provisions of section 212 and 235 of the Act.

(C) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-1 or L-1 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien remains eligible for H or L status, is coming to resume employment with the same employer for whom he or she had previously been authorized to work as an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant, and, is in possession of a valid H or L visa (if required). The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful H-4 or L-2 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if the spouse or parent of such alien through whom the H-4 or L-2 status was obtained is maintaining H-1 or L-1 status and the alien remains otherwise eligible for H-4 or L-2 status, and, the alien is in possession of a valid H-4 or L-2 visa (if required). The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status, who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful K-3 or K-4 status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien is in possession of a valid K-3 or K-4 visa and remains eligible for K-3 or K-4 status.

(D) The travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding and who is in lawful V status shall not be deemed an abandonment of the application if, upon returning to this country, the alien is admissible as a V nonimmigrant.

(iii) Under the Act of November 2, 1966. If an applicant who was admitted or paroled subsequent to January 1, 1959, later departs from the United States temporarily with no intention of abandoning his or her residence, and is readmitted or paroled upon return, the temporary absence shall be disregarded for purposes of the applicant's “last arrival” into the United States in regard to cases filed under section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1966.

(5) Decision—(i) General. The applicant shall be notified of the decision of the director and, if the application is denied, the reasons for the denial.

(ii) Under section 245 of the Act. If the application is approved, the applicant's permanent residence shall be recorded as of the date of the order approving the adjustment of status. An application for adjustment of status, as a preference alien, shall not be approved until an immigrant visa number has been allocated by the Department of State. No appeal lies from the denial of an application by the director, but the applicant, if not an arriving alien, retains the right to renew his or her application in proceedings under 8 CFR part 240. Also, an applicant who is a parolee and meets the two conditions described in § 245.2(a)(1) may renew a denied application in proceedings under 8 CFR part 240 to determine admissibility. At the time of renewal of the application, an applicant does not need to meet the statutory requirement of section 245(c) of the Act, or § 245.1(g), if, in fact, those requirements were met at the time the renewed application was initially filed with the director. Nothing in this section shall entitle an alien to proceedings under section 240 of the Act who is not otherwise so entitled.

(iii) Under the Act of November 2, 1966. If the application is approved, the applicant's permanent residence shall be recorded in accordance with the provisions of section 1. No appeal lies from the denial of an application by the director, but the applicant, if not an arriving alien, retains the right to renew his or her application in proceedings under 8 CFR part 240. Also, an applicant who is a parolee and meets the two conditions described in § 245.2(a)(1) may renew a denied application in proceedings under 8 CFR part 240 to determine admissibility.

(b) Application under section 2 of the Act of November 2, 1966. An application by a native or citizen of Cuba or by his spouse or child residing in the United States with him, who was lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence prior to November 2, 1966, and who desires such admission to be recorded as of an earlier date pursuant to section 2 of the Act of November 2, 1966, shall be made on Form I-485A. The application shall be accompanied by the Permanent Resident Card, Form I-151 or I-551, issued to the applicant in connection with his lawful admission for permanent residence. No appeal shall lie from the decision. If the application is approved, the applicant will be furnished with a replacement of his Form I-151 or I-551 bearing the new date as of which the lawful admission for permanent residence has been recorded.

(c) Application under section 214(d) of the Act. An application for permanent resident status pursuant to section 214(d) of the Act shall be filed on Form I-485. A separate application shall be filed by each applicant. If the application is approved, USCIS shall record the lawful admission of the applicant as of the date of approval. The applicant shall be notified of the decision and, if the application is denied, of the reasons therefor. No appeal shall lie from the denial of an application but such denial shall be without prejudice to the alien's right to renew his or her application in proceedings under 8 CFR part 240.

[30 FR 14778, Nov. 30, 1965] Editorial Note:For Federal Register citations affecting § 245.2, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at www.govinfo.gov.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 465 cases (93 in the last 5 years), 1963–2026 · leading case: Zixiang Li v. John F. Kerry, 710 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2013).
Zixiang Li v. John F. Kerry, 710 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 13× “See 8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(1). Pursuant to 8 C.”
Velarde, 23 I. & N. Dec. 253 (BIA 2002). · cites it 7× “On April 30, 2001, the respondent’s wife filed a Petition for Alien Relative (Form I-130) with the Service on the respondent’s behalf, and he simultaneously filed an Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485), pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(2)(i)…”
Matovski v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 722 (6th Cir. 2007). · cites it 11× “If 8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(5)(ii) is applicable here, however, it may not have been essential for the Immigration Judge to determine whether immigrant visas were immediately available to the petitioners during the removal proceedings.”
Jigar Babaria v. Antony Blinken, 87 F.4th 963 (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 11× “Plaintiffs contended that 8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(5)(ii) violates Congressional intent by requiring an immigrant visa to be available before the government can adjudicate an adjustment application.”
Artigas, 23 I. & N. Dec. 99 (BIA 2001). · cites it 20× “8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(1) (emphasis added).”
Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 646 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1981). · cites it 13× “8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(1) (1976). The regulations provided that, before the application “may be considered properly filed, a visa must be immediately available.”
Patel v. Garland, 596 U.S. 328 (2022). · cites it 2× “See 8 CFR §245.2 (a)(1) (giving USCIS authority over applica- tions for adjustment of status made outside of removal pro- ceedings).”
Garcia, 16 I. & N. Dec. 653 (BIA 1978). · cites it 8× “Interim Decision #2684 MATTER OF GARCIA In Deportation Proceedings A-20066063 Decided by Board December 27, 1978 (1) Rule that reopening of proceedings will be denied absent a prima facie showing that the statutory requirements for relief have been met must be reexamined as to…”
Ka Fung Chan v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 634 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1981). · cites it 8× “) Under 8 C.F.R. § 245.2 (a)(2) (1980), an application for adjustment of status is not properly filed unless the applicant establishes that he is entitled to a priority date for allotment of a nonpreference visa number in accordance with 8 C.”
Illya Britkovyy v. Alejandro Mayorkas, 60 F.4th 1024 (7th Cir. 2023). · cites it 4× “Regulations give USCIS ex- clusive jurisdiction to adjust the status of an “arriving alien,” 8 C.F.R. §§ 245.2 (a)(1), 1245.2(a)(1), and Britkovyy is an arriv- ing alien because he was paroled, not admitted, to the United States.”
Martinez-montalvo, 24 I. & N. Dec. 778 (BIA 2009). · cites it 11× “Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Under 8 C.F.R. §§ 245.2 (a)(1) and 1245.2(a)(1)(ii) (2008), Immigration Judges have no jurisdiction to adjudicate an application filed by an arriving alien seeking adjustment of status…”
Aaron Camacho Perez v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigr. Servs., 774 F.3d 960 (11th Cir. 2014). · cites it 6× “8 C.F.R. §§ 245.2 (a)(5)(iii), 1245.2(a)(5)(iii).”
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a) — 6 cases
Nyaga v. Ashcroft, 186 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (N.D. Ga. 2002).
Offiiong v. Holder, 864 F. Supp. 2d 611 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
Yodying, 17 I. & N. Dec. 155 (BIA 1979).
Wong, 12 I. & N. Dec. 407 (BIA 1967).
Zappa, 14 I. & N. Dec. 405 (BIA 1973).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(1) — 14 cases
Michel v. Mayorkas, 68 F.4th 74 (1st Cir. 2023).
Roussis, 18 I. & N. Dec. 256 (BIA 1982).
Guiragossian, 17 I. & N. Dec. 161 (BIA 1979).
Ho, 15 I. & N. Dec. 692 (BIA 1976).
Manneh, 16 I. & N. Dec. 272 (BIA 1977).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(2) — 12 cases
Garcia, 16 I. & N. Dec. 653 (BIA 1978). “Interim Decision #2684 MATTER OF GARCIA In Deportation Proceedings A-20066063 Decided by Board December 27, 1978 (1) Rule that reopening of proceedings will be denied absent a prima facie showing that the statutory requirements for relief have been met must be reexamined as to…”
Jellal Benslimane v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2005).
Kotte, 16 I. & N. Dec. 449 (BIA 1978).
Yodying, 17 I. & N. Dec. 155 (BIA 1979).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(2)(i)(B) — 2 cases
Shia Ass'n v. United States, 849 F. Supp. 2d 916 (N.D. Cal. 2012).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(3) — 2 cases
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(3)(iii) — 2 cases
Ahmed Bakran v. Sec'y United States Depart, 894 F.3d 557 (3rd Cir. 2018).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4) — 5 cases
Manneh, 16 I. & N. Dec. 272 (BIA 1977).
Lau, 14 I. & N. Dec. 694 (BIA 1974).
Wang, 16 I. & N. Dec. 711 (BIA 1979).
Huang (2nd Ver), 16 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1977).
Huang (1st Ver), 16 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1977).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4)(h) — 1 case
Charles Geach v. Tom Ridge, 444 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2006).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4)(ii) — 4 cases
Geach v. Chertoff, 444 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2006).
Barney v. Rogers, 83 F.3d 318 (9th Cir. 1996).
Charles Geach v. Tom Ridge, 444 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2006).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(5)(ii) — 1 case
Bermudez v. Stulz (S.D. Fla. 2020).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(aX1) — 1 case
Zappa, 14 I. & N. Dec. 405 (BIA 1973).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(b) — 4 cases
Wiesinger, 16 I. & N. Dec. 480 (BIA 1978).
Calilao, 16 I. & N. Dec. 104 (BIA 1977).
Grove, 13 I. & N. Dec. 572 (BIA 1970).
Javier, 12 I. & N. Dec. 782 (BIA 1968).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(b)(1) — 1 case
Lau, 14 I. & N. Dec. 694 (BIA 1974).
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(b)(2) — 1 case
Garcia, 16 I. & N. Dec. 653 (BIA 1978). “Interim Decision #2684 MATTER OF GARCIA In Deportation Proceedings A-20066063 Decided by Board December 27, 1978 (1) Rule that reopening of proceedings will be denied absent a prima facie showing that the statutory requirements for relief have been met must be reexamined as to…”
— 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(d) — 3 cases
Dixon, 16 I. & N. Dec. 355 (BIA 1977).
Dawson, 16 I. & N. Dec. 693 (BIA 1979).
Blair, 14 I. & N. Dec. 153 (BIA 1972).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.