9 C.F.R. § 201.43

Payment and accounting for livestock and live poultry

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Market agencies to make prompt accounting and transmittal of net proceeds. Each market agency shall, before the close of the next business day following the sale of any livestock consigned to it for sale, transmit or deliver to the consignor or shipper of the livestock, or the duly authorized agent, in the absence of any knowledge that any other person, or persons, has any interest in the livestock, the net proceeds received from the sale and a true written account of such sale, showing the number, weight, and price of each kind of animal sold, the date of sale, the commission, yardage, and other lawful charges, and such other facts as may be necessary to complete the account and show fully the true nature of the transaction.

(b) Prompt payment for livestock and live poultry—terms and conditions. (1) No packer, market agency, or dealer shall purchase livestock for which payment is made by a draft which is not a check, unless the seller expressly agrees in writing before the transaction that payment may be made by such a draft. (In cases of packers whose average annual purchases exceed $500,000, and market agencies and dealers acting as agents for such packers, see also § 201.200).

(2)(i) No packer, market agency, or dealer purchasing livestock for cash and not on credit, whether for slaughter or not for slaughter, shall mail a check in payment for the livestock unless the check is placed in an envelope with proper first class postage prepaid and properly addressed to the seller or such person as he may direct, in a post office, letter box, or other receptacle regularly used for the deposit of mail for delivery, from which such envelope is scheduled to be collected (A) before the close of the next business day following the purchase of livestock and transfer of possession thereof, or (B) in the case of a purchase on a “carcass” or “grade and yield” basis, before the close of the first business day following determination of the purchase price.

(ii) No packer, market agency, or dealer purchasing livestock for slaughter, shall mail a check in payment for the livestock unless (A) the check is made available for actual delivery and the seller or his duly authorized representative is not present to receive payment, at the point of transfer of possession of such livestock, on or before the close of the next business day following the purchase of the livestock and transfer of possession thereof, or, in the case of a purchase on a “carcass” or “grade and yield” basis, on or before the close of the first business day following determination of the purchase price; or unless (B) the seller expressly agrees in writing before the transaction that payment may be made by such mailing of a check.

(3) Any agreement referred to in paragraph (b) (1) or (2) of this section shall be disclosed in the records of any market agency or dealer selling such livestock, and in the records of the packer, market agency, or dealer purchasing such livestock, and retained by such person for such time as is required by any law, or by written notice served on such person by the Administrator, but not less than two calendar years from the date of expiration thereof.

(4) No packer, live poultry dealer, market agency, or livestock dealer shall as a condition to its purchase of livestock or poultry, impose, demand, compel or dictate the terms or manner of payment, or attempt to obtain a payment agreement from a seller through any threat of retaliation or other form of intimidation.

(c) Purchaser to promptly reimburse agents. Each packer, market agency, or dealer who utilizes or employs an agent to purchase livestock for him, shall, in transactions where such agent uses his own funds to pay for livestock purchased on order, transmit or deliver to such agent the full amount of the purchase price before the close of the next business day following receipt of notification of the payment of such purchase price, unless otherwise expressly agreed between the parties before the purchase of the livestock. Any such agreement shall be disclosed in the records of the principal and in the records of any market agency or dealer acting as such agent.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0015) (7 U.S.C. 228, 7 U.S.C. 222, and 15 U.S.C. 46) [49 FR 6083, Feb. 17, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 8235, Mar. 6, 1984; 54 FR 16355, Apr. 24, 1989; 68 FR 75388, Dec. 31, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1960–2015 · leading case: Fillippo v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc., 466 F. Supp. 1008 (E.D. Pa. 1978).
Fillippo v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc., 466 F. Supp. 1008 (E.D. Pa. 1978). · cites it 8× “9 C.F.R. § 201.43 (c). Plaintiff paid the three livestock sales upon SBI’s default, Deposition of Frank A.”
Monfort, Inc. v. Kunkel (In Re Morken), 182 B.R. 1007 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995). · cites it 3× “Defendants Zumbrota, Kane, H & L and Lanesboro argue that, pursuant to 9 C.F.R. § 201.43 (b)(2)(i), they were cash sellers of cattle to Spring Grove and that, as such, they have a right of reclamation pursuant to Minn.”
Hedrick v. S. Bonaccurso & Sons, Inc., 466 F. Supp. 1025 (E.D. Pa. 1978). · cites it 3× “43 , “[did] not necessarily support a conclusion that the regulation, designed to regulate payment procedures between a buyer and seller, was also intended to determine security rights between the sellers and third parties holding a valid [security interest under state law] on…”
In the Matter of Samuels & Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Curtis R. Stowers v. James S. Mahon, Tr., & C. I. T. Corp., 483 F.2d 557 (5th Cir. 1973). · cites it 5× “, 9 C.F.R. 201.43, 201.99. 10 Central to the district court's decision was the belief that the appellants' delivery of the animals while making a reservation of title acted solely as the taking of a purchase money security interest under Sec.”
Dale Van Wyk & Van's Livestock, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Sec'y of Agric., 570 F.2d 701 (8th Cir. 1978). · cites it 2× “43(b) of the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture, 9 C.F.R. § 201.43 (b). 3 He also concluded that Van’s Livestock, Inc.”
Robert E. Parchman Virgil R. (Ray) Lemons Jack E. Hamilton v. United States Dep't of Agric., 852 F.2d 858 (6th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “For similar reasons, the findings that the stockyard operators violated 9 C.F.R. §§ 201.43 , 201.49, 201.71, 201.”
Mahon v. Stowers, 416 U.S. 100 (1974). · cites it 2× “The first regulation, 9 CFR § 201.43 (b), 12 requires that a packer “before the close of the next business day following the purchase of livestock and the determination of the amount of the purchase price, transmit or deliver to the seller or his duly authorized agent the full…”
United States v. Wyoming Nat'l Bank Of Casper, 505 F.2d 1064 (10th Cir. 1974). “, and particularly regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder and appearing as 9 CFR 201.43(b) and 201.99, control. Reliance is placed on In re Samuels & Co.”
Major Lewis v. Earl L. Butz, Sec'y of Agric. & the United States of Am., 512 F.2d 681 (8th Cir. 1975). · cites it 2× “43(b) of the regulations promulgated under the Act, 9 C.F.R. § 201.43 (b) (1974), 2 by refusing to honor a check drawn on his bank account to pay for cattle purchased on his behalf by an agent.”
Glover Livestock Comm'n Co., Inc. v. Clifford M. Hardin, Sec'y of Agric., & the United States of Am., 454 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1972). “§§ 208 , 213(a) and 221, and 9 CFR §§ 201.43 (a), 201.55 and 201.71 (1971).”
Davis v. United States (In Re Farmers & Ranchers Livestock Auction, Inc.), 46 B.R. 781 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1984). “The relevant portions of 9 C.F.R. § 201.43 are as follows: (a) Market agencies to make profit accounting and transmit'tal of net proceeds.”
In the Matter of Samuels & Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Curtis R. Stowers v. James S. Mahon, Tr., & C.I.T. Corp., 510 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1975). “9 CFR §§ 201.43 (b), — .99. While a lapse of time occurring between delivery of the cattle and payment, even if only a day, might be considered an extension of credit, the course of dealing between the parties establishes that this was a sale for cash.”
— 9 C.F.R. § 201.43(b) — 2 cases
United States v. Wyoming Nat'l Bank Of Casper, 505 F.2d 1064 (10th Cir. 1974). “, and particularly regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture promulgated thereunder and appearing as 9 CFR 201.43(b) and 201.99, control. Reliance is placed on In re Samuels & Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.