9 C.F.R. § 202.2
Definitions
As used in these rules:
(a) Rate proceeding means a proceeding involving the determination and prescription of any rate or charge made or proposed to be made for any stockyard service furnished at a stockyard by a stockyard owner or market agency, or a proceeding involving any rule, regulation or practice affecting any such rate or charge; and
(b) Administrator means the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), or any officer or employee of AMS to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act for the Administrator.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1957–1964 · leading case: Am. Exp. & Isbrandtsen Lines v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States of Am., 334 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1964).
Am. Exp. & Isbrandtsen Lines v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States of Am., 334 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1964). “2(g) defines ‘hearing’ to be ‘that part of the proceeding which involves the submission of evidence’, it is fundamental to the law that the submission of evidence is not required to characterize ‘a full hearing’ where such evidence is immaterial to the issue to be decided.”
Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n v. United States, 241 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1957). “11(a) and 9 C.F.R. 202.2(g). At such a hearing, so says the stockyard company, it intended to and would show that Regulation 10(c) was reasonable and necessary to prevent market agencies in the position of petitioner from undermining the business and public efficiency of the…”
Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n v. United States, 241 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1957). “11(a) and 9 C.F.R. 202.2(g). At such a hearing, so says the stockyard company, it intended to and would show *196 that Regulation 10(c) was reasonable and necessary to prevent market agencies in the position of petitioner from undermining the business and public efficiency of…”
— 9 C.F.R. § 202.2(g) — 3 cases
Am. Exp. & Isbrandtsen Lines v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States of Am., 334 F.2d 185 (9th Cir. 1964). “2(g) defines ‘hearing’ to be ‘that part of the proceeding which involves the submission of evidence’, it is fundamental to the law that the submission of evidence is not required to characterize ‘a full hearing’ where such evidence is immaterial to the issue to be decided.”
Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n v. United States, 241 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1957). “11(a) and 9 C.F.R. 202.2(g). At such a hearing, so says the stockyard company, it intended to and would show that Regulation 10(c) was reasonable and necessary to prevent market agencies in the position of petitioner from undermining the business and public efficiency of the…”
Producers Livestock Mktg. Ass'n v. United States, 241 F.2d 192 (10th Cir. 1957). “11(a) and 9 C.F.R. 202.2(g). At such a hearing, so says the stockyard company, it intended to and would show *196 that Regulation 10(c) was reasonable and necessary to prevent market agencies in the position of petitioner from undermining the business and public efficiency of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.