Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-2-301 (2024)

Short title

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part 3 may be cited as the "Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act".

Source: L. 2013: Entire part R&RE, (HB 13-1204), ch. 239, p. 1159, § 1, effective July 1, 2014.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 14-2-301 as it existed prior to 2013.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Ikeler, 161 P.3d 663 (Colo. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Marriage of Ikeler, 161 P.3d 663 (Colo. 2007). · cites it 6× “In this case, we address whether a court can review a waiver of attorney's fees in a valid marital agreement for unconscionability at the time of enforcement under the Colorado Marital Agreement Act ("CMAA"), sections 14-2-301 to -310, C.R.S. (2006).”
In re Marriage of Zander, 2021 CO 12. · cites it 3× “1, § 14-2-301, 1986 Colo. Sess. Laws 713 , was replaced on July 1, 2014, by the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (“UPMAA”), Ch.”
In re Marriage of Blaine, 2021 CO 13. · cites it 3× “The UPMAA, in turn, replaced the Colorado Marital Agreement Act (“CMAA”) on July 1, 2014, and is codified at sections 14-2-301 to -313, C.R.S. (2020).”
09 In re the Marriage of Zander, 2019 COA 149, 486 P.3d 352. · cites it 2× “2019 (the current version of the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (UPMAA), sections 14-2-301 to -313, C.R.S. 5 2019, applies only to agreements signed on or after July 1, 2014); Ch.”
In Re the Marriage of Lafaye, 89 P.3d 455 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003). “In May 1998, the court conducted a two-day evidentiary hearing concerning the validity of the post-nuptial agreement under the Colorado Marital Agreement Act (Act), § 14-2-301, et seq., C.R.S.2002. The court determined that the post-nuptial agreement was not an enforceable…”
In Re Marriage of Blaine, 2019 COA 164. · cites it 3× “testified that he intended by that conveyance that the property would be the wife’s separate property, a division of the court of appeals concludes that the district court did not err in ruling that the property was the wife’s separate property in their dissolution action, even…”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Denise ZANDER, & John Zander, 480 P.3d 676 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 3× “1 , § 14-2-301 , 1986 Colo. Sess. Laws 713 , was replaced on July 1, 2014 , by the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act ( "UPMAA" ) , Ch.”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Jack Allen BLAINE, & Qing He, 480 P.3d 691 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 3× “The UPMAA , in turn, replaced the Colorado Marital Agreement Act ( "CMAA" ) on July 1, 2014 , and is codified at sections 14-2-301 to -313, C.R.S. ( 2020 ) .”
In Re the Marriage of Rahn, 914 P.2d 463 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “The prenuptial agreement was executed in another state and prior to the effective date of the Colorado Marital Agreement Act, § 14-2-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”
In Re the Marriage of Goldin, 923 P.2d 376 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “We conclude the matter must be remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the agreements under the Colorado Marital Agreement Act, § 14-2-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”
In Re the Marriage of Christen, 899 P.2d 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). “Under the Colorado Marital Agreement Act, § 14-2-301, et seq., C.R.S. (1987 Repl.Vol.”
Marriage of Palominos Correa, No. 24CA2196 (Colo. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2026). · cites it 2× “The then- operative Colorado Marital Agreement Act (CMAA), §§ 14-2-301 to -310, C.R.S. 2013, provides no guidance regarding whether to apply Colorado’s or Chile’s law to determine the agreement’s validity.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.