(Repealed)
Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 390, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-1-105. L. 72: p. 267, § 4. L. 73: p.
531, § 83. L. 74: (1) and (2) amended, p. 409, §§ 26, 27, effective April 11; (3) and (4) added, p.
251, § 3, effective January 1, 1975. L. 76: (1) amended, p. 548, § 7, effective July 1. L. 77:
Entire section R&RE, p. 867, § 15, effective July 1, 1979. L. 79: (1), (6), and (7) R&RE and
(1)(c) amended, pp. 669, 700, §§ 16, 69, effective July 1. L. 81: (1)(b), (1)(c), and (7) amended
and (8) and (9) added, pp. 969, 970, 972, 986, §§ 1, 1, 1, 2, effective July 1. L. 82: (8) repealed,
p. 312, § 3, effective July 1. L. 84: (1)(a) amended, p. 513, § 5, effective July 1. L. 85: (9)(d)
added, p. 675, § 4, effective June 7; (1)(a)(II), (2), and (4) amended and (1)(a)(III), (1)(a)(IV),
(9)(a)(VI), and (9)(e) added, pp. 622, 652, 655, 667, 675, §§ 5, 7, 1, 3, effective July 1. L. 86:
(9)(a)(VII), (9)(a)(VIII), and (9)(f) added, p. 769, §§ 1, 2, effective July 1. L. 87: (9)(a)(IV.5)
added, p. 606, § 9, effective April 16. L. 88: (1)(a)(III), IP(9)(a), (9)(d)(I), and (9)(e)(I)
amended, (1)(b)(IV), (1)(b)(VI) to (1)(b)(VIII), and (10) added, and (1)(b)(V) added and
amended, pp. 680, 681, 716, 711, 1439 §§ 3, 5, 2, 4, 14, 44, effective July 1. L. 89:
(1)(a)(III)(A), (1)(a)(IV), (1)(b)(I), (2), and (9)(a)(V) amended and (1)(b)(V) to (1)(b)(VIII)
repealed, pp. 829, 861, §§ 40, 156, effective July 1. L. 90: (11) added, p. 989, § 1, effective
April 16; (9)(a)(IV), (9)(a)(IV.5), (9)(a)(VI), and (9)(a)(VII) repealed and (9.5) added, p. 955, §§
27, 25, effective June 7. L. 91: (4) and (10) amended, p. 404, §§ 5, 6, effective June 6. L. 92:
(11) repealed, p. 393, § 25, effective July 1. L. 93: (1)(a)(IV), (1)(c), and (10) amended and
(1)(a)(V) and (9.7) added, pp. 1983, 54, 1730, 1981, §§ 8, 19, 12, 7, 9, effective July 1. L. 95:
(1)(a)(V)(D) amended, p. 879, § 15, effective May 24; (4) amended, p. 1293, § 3, effective July
1. L. 96: (1)(a)(III)(A) and (1)(b)(II) amended and (1)(a)(III)(E) added, p. 1841, § 4, effective
July 1; (9)(a)(III) amended, p. 736, § 7, effective July 1. L. 97: (9)(a)(IX), (9.5)(a.5), (9.5)(c.5),
and (9.5)(c.7) added, p. 1546, §§ 17, 18, effective July 1; (1)(b)(IV) amended, p. 1009, § 11,
effective August 6. L. 98: (1)(a)(V)(C) amended, p. 399, § 6, effective April 21; (1)(a)(VI)
added, p. 1447, § 38, effective July 1; (9)(g) added, p. 1264, § 1, effective July 1; (1)(a)(V)(C),
(1)(a)(V)(D), (1)(c), and (9)(e)(I) amended and (1)(a)(V)(C.3), (1)(a)(V)(C.5), (1)(b)(II.5),
(9)(e.5), and (9.7)(c) added, pp. 1289, 1290, §§ 4, 5, 6, 7, effective November 1. L. 99: (9.5)(a)
amended and (9.7)(b)(XIII) added, pp. 800, 794, §§ 22, 3, effective July 1. L. 2000: IP(9.7)(b),
(9.7)(b)(I), (9.7)(b)(II), and (9.7)(b)(III) amended, p. 702, § 25, effective July 1; (1)(a)(III)(A.5)
added, p. 1107, § 3, effective August 2; (12) added, p. 1049, § 12, effective September 1. L.
2001: (13) added, p. 1009, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2002: (1)(a)(V)(C) and (1)(a)(V)(C.3)
amended and (1)(a)(V)(C.7) added, p. 124, § 1, effective March 26; (1)(a)(V)(C.7) amended, p.
1192, § 41, effective July 1; (9)(e.5) amended, p. 758, § 3, effective July 1; (1)(a)(V)(C.7)
amended and entire section repealed, pp. 1566, 1463, §§ 387, 3, effective October 1. L. 2002,
3rd Ex. Sess.: (4) amended, p. 15, § 7, effective July 12.
Editor's note: This section was relocated to § 18-1.3-401 in 2002.
Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending
subsection (1)(a)(V)(C.7) and repealing this section, see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws
of Colorado 2002.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
461
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case:
People v. Cooper, 27 P.3d 348 (Colo. 2001).
People v. Cooper, 27 P.3d 348 (Colo. 2001).
· cites it 144× “16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
· cites it 119× “16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
People v. Phillips, 652 P.2d 575 (Colo. 1982).
· cites it 57× “I believe similar considerations are reflected in the legislative decision to require a statement of reasons in support of a sentence at both the high and low ends of the range of authorized sentences under section 18-1-105, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Supp.).”
People v. Lacey, 723 P.2d 111 (Colo. 1986).
· cites it 74× “These requirements, in my view, are qualitatively distinct from the procedures applicable to the usual sentencing hearing conducted pursuant to section 18-1-105. As the court notes, the only requirements for an enhanced sentencing proceeding under section 18-1-105(9)(a)(III) are…”
People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199 (Colo. 1994).
· cites it 58× “See § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV), 8B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.”
People v. Valdez, 56 P.3d 1148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 49× “shall be adjudged an habitual criminal and shall be punished for the felony offense of which such person is convicted by confinement in a correctional facility for a term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range pursuant to section 18-1-105, C.R.S., for the class of…”
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
· cites it 37× “However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
People v. Chippewa, 751 P.2d 607 (Colo. 1988).
· cites it 20× “At the providency hearing on August 3, 1983, the district court questioned counsel for the defense and the prosecution to ascertain whether the defendant was subject to a mandatory aggravated sentence under section 18-1-105, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The attorneys agreed that the…”
People v. Perea, 74 P.3d 326 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 30× “Thus, reincarceration for a parole violation is incarceration on an already imposed sentence, and a defendant convicted of a felony committed while on parole may receive a sentence that runs consecutively to any reincarceration that may be imposed if the defendant's parole is…”
People v. Luther, 58 P.3d 1013 (Colo. 2002).
· cites it 16× “Section 18-1-105 was renumbered in 2002 and is now found at section 18-1.”
People v. Johnson, 13 P.3d 309 (Colo. 2000).
· cites it 18× “Under the community corrections statute, the trial court may impose a sentence to community corrections "which includes terms, lengths, and conditions pursuant to section 18-1-105, CRS." § 17-27-105(1)(b).”
People v. Romero, 694 P.2d 1256 (Colo. 1985).
· cites it 23× “Included in the list of extraordinary aggravating circumstances is the fact that the defendant was on parole or probation for a felony at the time of the commission of the felony in question.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1) — 34 cases
People v. Cooper, 27 P.3d 348 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(V)(A) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a) — 27 cases
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(I) — 14 cases
People v. Chippewa, 751 P.2d 607 (Colo. 1988).
“At the providency hearing on August 3, 1983, the district court questioned counsel for the defense and the prosecution to ascertain whether the defendant was subject to a mandatory aggravated sentence under section 18-1-105, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The attorneys agreed that the…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(II) — 5 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(III) — 3 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV) — 21 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V) — 17 cases
People v. Cooper, 27 P.3d 348 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
People v. Johnson, 13 P.3d 309 (Colo. 2000).
“Under the community corrections statute, the trial court may impose a sentence to community corrections "which includes terms, lengths, and conditions pursuant to section 18-1-105, CRS." § 17-27-105(1)(b).”
People v. Valdez, 56 P.3d 1148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
“shall be adjudged an habitual criminal and shall be punished for the felony offense of which such person is convicted by confinement in a correctional facility for a term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range pursuant to section 18-1-105, C.R.S., for the class of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(A) — 62 cases
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
People v. Valdez, 56 P.3d 1148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
“shall be adjudged an habitual criminal and shall be punished for the felony offense of which such person is convicted by confinement in a correctional facility for a term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range pursuant to section 18-1-105, C.R.S., for the class of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(B) — 3 cases
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
People v. Johnson, 13 P.3d 309 (Colo. 2000).
“Under the community corrections statute, the trial court may impose a sentence to community corrections "which includes terms, lengths, and conditions pursuant to section 18-1-105, CRS." § 17-27-105(1)(b).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(C) — 4 cases
People v. Cooper, 27 P.3d 348 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(D) — 5 cases
People v. Perea, 74 P.3d 326 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
“Thus, reincarceration for a parole violation is incarceration on an already imposed sentence, and a defendant convicted of a felony committed while on parole may receive a sentence that runs consecutively to any reincarceration that may be imposed if the defendant's parole is…”
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(E) — 4 cases
People v. Perea, 74 P.3d 326 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
“Thus, reincarceration for a parole violation is incarceration on an already imposed sentence, and a defendant convicted of a felony committed while on parole may receive a sentence that runs consecutively to any reincarceration that may be imposed if the defendant's parole is…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(v) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(a)(v)(A) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(aq)(V)(E) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(b) — 8 cases
People v. Phillips, 652 P.2d 575 (Colo. 1982).
“I believe similar considerations are reflected in the legislative decision to require a statement of reasons in support of a sentence at both the high and low ends of the range of authorized sentences under section 18-1-105, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Supp.).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(b)(1) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(b)(VI) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(b)(VII) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(1)(c) — 3 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(10) — 17 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(13) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(2) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(2)(b)(4) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(3) — 3 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(4) — 8 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(4)(a) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(5) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(6) — 72 cases
People v. Romero, 694 P.2d 1256 (Colo. 1985).
“Included in the list of extraordinary aggravating circumstances is the fact that the defendant was on parole or probation for a felony at the time of the commission of the felony in question.”
People v. Phillips, 652 P.2d 575 (Colo. 1982).
“I believe similar considerations are reflected in the legislative decision to require a statement of reasons in support of a sentence at both the high and low ends of the range of authorized sentences under section 18-1-105, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Supp.).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(7) — 31 cases
People v. Phillips, 652 P.2d 575 (Colo. 1982).
“I believe similar considerations are reflected in the legislative decision to require a statement of reasons in support of a sentence at both the high and low ends of the range of authorized sentences under section 18-1-105, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Supp.).”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(8) — 3 cases
Martin v. People, 27 P.3d 846 (Colo. 2001).
“16, § 18-1-105, 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 669 , 669-70.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9) — 27 cases
People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199 (Colo. 1994).
“See § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV), 8B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.”
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(V) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a) — 21 cases
People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199 (Colo. 1994).
“See § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV), 8B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.”
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(D) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(I) — 7 cases
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
People v. Valdez, 56 P.3d 1148 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
“shall be adjudged an habitual criminal and shall be punished for the felony offense of which such person is convicted by confinement in a correctional facility for a term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range pursuant to section 18-1-105, C.R.S., for the class of…”
People v. Lacey, 723 P.2d 111 (Colo. 1986).
“These requirements, in my view, are qualitatively distinct from the procedures applicable to the usual sentencing hearing conducted pursuant to section 18-1-105. As the court notes, the only requirements for an enhanced sentencing proceeding under section 18-1-105(9)(a)(III) are…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(II) — 11 cases
People v. Chippewa, 751 P.2d 607 (Colo. 1988).
“At the providency hearing on August 3, 1983, the district court questioned counsel for the defense and the prosecution to ascertain whether the defendant was subject to a mandatory aggravated sentence under section 18-1-105, 8B C.R.S. (1986). The attorneys agreed that the…”
People v. Romero, 694 P.2d 1256 (Colo. 1985).
“Included in the list of extraordinary aggravating circumstances is the fact that the defendant was on parole or probation for a felony at the time of the commission of the felony in question.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(III) — 8 cases
People v. Lacey, 723 P.2d 111 (Colo. 1986).
“These requirements, in my view, are qualitatively distinct from the procedures applicable to the usual sentencing hearing conducted pursuant to section 18-1-105. As the court notes, the only requirements for an enhanced sentencing proceeding under section 18-1-105(9)(a)(III) are…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(IV) — 5 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(V) — 17 cases
People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199 (Colo. 1994).
“See § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV), 8B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.”
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(VIII) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(X) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(a)(v) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(b) — 1 case
People v. Romero, 694 P.2d 1256 (Colo. 1985).
“Included in the list of extraordinary aggravating circumstances is the fact that the defendant was on parole or probation for a felony at the time of the commission of the felony in question.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(c) — 4 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(d)(I) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(d)(II) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(e) — 2 cases
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(e)(I) — 1 case
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(e)(II) — 1 case
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(9)(f) — 3 cases
People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199 (Colo. 1994).
“See § 18-1-105(1)(a)(IV), 8B C.R.S. (1993 Supp.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(I)(A)(V) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(Q)(a)(v) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(V)(A) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(V)(E) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(a)(V)(A) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a) — 11 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(I) — 9 cases
People v. Haymaker, 716 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1986).
“However, subsection (9)(a) of section 18-1-105 lists six circumstances that require a court "to sentence the defendant to a term greater than the maximum in the presumptive range, but not more than twice the maximum term authorized in the presumptive range for the punishment of…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(II) — 3 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(III) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(IV) — 10 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V)(A) — 11 cases
People v. Luther, 58 P.3d 1013 (Colo. 2002).
“Section 18-1-105 was renumbered in 2002 and is now found at section 18-1.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V)(B) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V)(C) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V)(D) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(V)(E) — 1 case
People v. Luther, 58 P.3d 1013 (Colo. 2002).
“Section 18-1-105 was renumbered in 2002 and is now found at section 18-1.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(a)(Y)(C) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(b) — 3 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(b)(I) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(b)(V) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(b)(VI) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(b)(VII) — 2 cases
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-1-105(l)(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.