Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 26-2-131 (2026)
Public assistance not assignable
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
No assistance payments made to an eligible recipient under this article shall be transferable or assignable at law or in equity, and none of the money paid or payable under this article shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.
Source: L. 73: R&RE, p. 1195, § 2. C.R.S. 1963: § 119-3-31.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1982–2008 · leading case: Brown v. Hahn-Martinez, 387 B.R. 611 (D. Colo. 2008).
Brown v. Hahn-Martinez, 387 B.R. 611 (D. Colo. 2008). “” Colo.Rev.Stat. § 26-2-131 exempts public assistance from being “subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.”
In Re Parrish, 19 B.R. 331 (Bankr.D. Colo. 1982). “| CRS 22-64-120 -----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------- Public employees' retirement benefits | no limit | CRS 24-51-120, 219…”
Anderson Boneless Beef, Inc. v. Sunshine Health Care Ctr., Inc., 852 P.2d 1340 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “See § 26-2-131, C.R.S. (1989 Repl.Vol. 11B). Here, Anderson did not present any evidence that, in August 1991, Sunshine was providing services to the beneficiaries.”
In Re Besser, 356 B.R. 531 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2006). “…homestead is exempt. C.R.S. § 38-41-201. Under Title 26, "Human Service Code,” public assistance payments are exempt. C.R.S. § 26-2-131.”
Schaerrer v. Westman Comm'n Co., 769 P.2d 1058 (Colo. 1989). “or be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, bankruptcy proceedings, or other legal process"); § 26-2-131, 11 C.R.S. (1982) ("[N]one of the money paid or payable [as public assistance benefits] shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.