Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 43
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-401 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part 4 shall be known and may be cited as the "Outdoor Advertising Act".

Source: L. 81: Entire part R&RE, p. 2006, § 1, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 43-1-401 as it existed prior to 1981.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo. 1986). · cites it 6× “This case is an appeal by the Colorado Department of Highways (Department) from an order by the Denver District Court, holding that the Outdoor Advertising Act, sections 43-1-401 to -420, 17 C.R.S. (1984) (Act), was unconstitutionally retrospective in its operation.”
Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc., 830 P.2d 1061 (Colo. 1992). “We, however, have previously held that a home-rule city can exercise control over outdoor advertising within its borders under its zoning authority only to the extent that the local ordinance does not materially impede the significant state goals expressed in the Outdoor…”
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Highways, 751 P.2d 632 (Colo. 1988). “The district court held that the control of outdoor advertising is a matter of mixed statewide and local concern and that, consequently, the permit provisions of the Outdoor Advertising Act, §§ 43-1-401 to -420, 17 C.R.S. (1984 & 1987 Supp.”
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). “§ 601-3 (1983), promulgated by the department pursuant to the Outdoor Advertising Act, §§ 43-1-401 to -420, 17 C.R.S. (1984 and 1987 Supp.”
City of Fort Collins v. Root Outdoor Advert., Inc., 788 P.2d 149 (Colo. 1990). · cites it 2× “By stipulation, the issues were narrowed to a declaratory judgment whether (1) the sign code effects a taking of property without just compensation or due process of law; and (2) whether the sign code is in conflict with, and preempted by, the Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act,…”
State Dept. of Highways, Etc. v. Davis, 596 P.2d 400 (Colo. Ct. App. 1979). “The Department further contends that the trial court erred in allowing admission of evidence that the Colorado Outdoor *402 Advertising Act, § 43-1-401 et seq., C.R.S. 1973, prevented the landowners from building a sign at the turn-in from the highway to the access road…”
State Dep't of Highways, Div. of Highways v. Pigg, 656 P.2d 46 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). “In this eminent domain proceeding brought by the Colorado State Department of Highways (Department) under the “Outdoor Advertising Act,” § 43-1-401 et seq., C.R.S.1973 (the Act), George W.”
Pigg v. State Dep't of Highways, 746 P.2d 961 (Colo. 1987). “The Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act (Act), § 43-1-401 to -420, 17 C.R.S. (1984), and regulations promulgated thereunder by the appellant Colorado State Department of Highways (Department), 2 C.”
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Bd. of Adjustment, 800 P.2d 1349 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “§ 131 (1982) and the Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act, § 43-1-401, et seq., C.R.S. (1984 Repl.Vol.”
Root Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. City of Fort Collins, 759 P.2d 59 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “More specifically, the trial court held that the City’s Sign Code which allowed plaintiffs a five-year “Amortization Period” to remove their nonconforming signs did not satisfy the just compensation requirement of the Colorado Outdoor Advertising Act, § 43-1-401, et seq., C.R.S.…”
Faustin v. City & Cty. of Denver, Colorado, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (D. Colo. 2000). · cites it 2× “) From his police cruiser, Officer Blea called Lieutenant Fink, who advised Faustin that he display of the banner could be in violation of Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 43-1-401 to 43-1-408 (1999) [hereinafter "Outdoor Advertising Act"].”
State Dep't of Highways, Div. of Highways v. Pizza, 653 P.2d 69 (Colo. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “Plaintiff, State Department of Highways (Department), commenced this action under the Outdoor Advertising Act (the Act), § 43-1-401, et seq., C.R.S.1973, to obtain an order requiring the sign owner to remove his sign for failure to renew and keep current his roadside advertising…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.