Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 11 — LIBRARIES AND MUSEUMS · Chapter 189 — Law Libraries
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 11-10 (2025)

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Sec. 11-19b.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Boria v. Comm'r of Corr., 199 A.3d 1127 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Boria v. Comm'r of Corr., 199 A.3d 1127 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 6× “The rules also provide the nonmovant with the right to pre- sent oral argument on the motion to dismiss at the court’s short calendar.”
Farren v. Farren, 64 A.3d 352 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “On July 11, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the defendant’s motion to open the judgment, claiming that the motion was defective because it did not have a memorandum of law attached as required by Practice Book § 11-10. 3 *149 On July 12, 2011, the defendant filed a…”
Vertex, Inc. v. City of Waterbury, 898 A.2d 178 (Conn. 2006). “See Practice Book § 17-45 (summary judgment motion must be placed on short calendar no less than fifteen days after it was filed and adverse party may, within ten days of filing motion, request that motion be placed on short calendar no less than thirty days after filing of…”
Teodoro v. City of Bristol, 195 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 3× “The court also advised the parties during the argument that the plaintiff's surreply brief and attached exhibits had been filed improperly, without the court's permission, in violation of Practice Book § 11-10 (c). Even so, it granted the defendants permission to file their own…”
Unifund CCR Partners v. Schaeppi, 11 A.3d 723 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 5× “Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because it lacked the requisite memorandum of law accompanying it pursuant to Practice Book § 11-10 and (2) concluded that the judgment hen that formed the basis…”
Brown v. Comm'r of Corr., 282 A.3d 959 (Conn. 2022). “Although we acknowledge that habeas actions are civil proceedings in nature, the introductory provision to the general rules governing habeas proceedings makes it clear that, ‘‘[e]xcept as otherwise provided herein, the procedures set forth in Sections 23-22 through 23-42 shall…”
Krevis v. City of Bridgeport, 817 A.2d 628 (Conn. 2003). “” Practice Book § 11-10 provides: “A memorandum of law briefly outlining the claims of law and authority pertinent thereto shall be filed and served by the movant with the following motions and requests: (1) motions regarding parties filed pursuant to Sections 9-18 through 9-22…”
Stelco Indus., Inc. v. Cohen, 438 A.2d 759 (Conn. 1980). “The trial court was therefore not in error in finding that the defendant had given adequate notice of breach to the plaintiff.”
Weigold v. Patel, 840 A.2d 19 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004). “Although the plaintiff cited no rule of practice in his brief, we assume that he is relying on Practice Book § 11-10, which provides in relevant part: “A memorandum of law briefly outlining the claims of law and authority pertinent thereto shall be filed and served by the movant…”
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Mollo, 185 A.3d 643 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). “" Practice Book § 11-10. "The party seeking summary judgment has the burden of showing the absence of any genuine issue [of] material facts which, under applicable principles of substantive law, entitle him to a judgment as a matter of law .”
Ion Bank v. J.C.C. Custom Homes, LLC, 206 A.3d 208 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019). “Moreover, our rules require that a motion seeking to substitute in a new plaintiff pursuant to Practice Book § 9-20 be accompanied by a memorandum of law "outlining the claims of law and authority pertinent thereto.”
Sabrina C. v. Fortin, 170 A.3d 100 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “The defendant, when self-represented, had failed to file the requisite supporting memorandum of law pursuant to Practice Book § 11-10 when he filed his motion to vacate the civil protection order.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 11-10(c): 1 case
Corneroli v. Kutz, 193 A.3d 64 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.