Section
15-155 is repealed, effective May 4, 2011.
(1961, P.A. 506, S. 22; 1963, P.A. 564, S. 2; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 392; P.A. 73-257, S. 20, 27; P.A. 76-365, S. 1, 2; P.A. 81-423, S. 15, 25; P.A. 82-436, S. 5, 11; 82-472, S. 49, 183; P.A. 83-266, S. 1, 4; 83-587, S. 30, 96; P.A. 84-495, S. 2, 4; P.A. 86-418, S. 2, 3; P.A. 94-130, S. 10; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-3, S. 394; Sept. Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-8, S. 21; P.A. 10-179, S. 57; P.A. 11-6, S. 165; 11-80, S. 1, 13.)
Secs. 15-155a and 15-155b. Annual report of receipts from vessel registration fees and payments therefrom. State distribution of revenue from fees for vessel registration. Sections 15-155a and 15-155b are repealed, effective October 1, 2009.
(P.A. 81-423, S. 19, 20, 25; P.A. 82-436, S. 6, 11; P.A. 83-266, S. 2, 4; P.A. 94-65, S. 3, 4; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 09-3, S. 513.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case:
State v. Brice, 806 S.E.2d 32 (N.C. 2017).
State v. Brice, 806 S.E.2d 32 (N.C. 2017).
“C.G.S. § 15-155, which is entitled "Defects which do not vitiate" and which provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o judgment upon any indictment for felony or misdemeanor .”
State v. Ramey, 349 S.E.2d 566 (N.C. 1986).
“C.G.S. § 15-155. However, this rule cannot be used to “ensnare” a defendant and deprive him of the opportunity to adequately defend himself.”
State v. McKinney, 430 S.E.2d 300 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 15-155 (1983). Our construction of the statutes at issue incorporates the rights afforded a criminal defendant under the United States Constitution.”
State v. James, 365 S.E.2d 579 (N.C. 1988).
“The defendant next assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to quash the indictments for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury and robbery with a firearm.”
State v. Everett, 399 S.E.2d 305 (N.C. 1991).
“C.G.S. § 15-155 (1990). In cases of sexual assaults on children, temporal specificity requisites diminish.”
State v. Hensley, 462 S.E.2d 550 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
“C.G.S. § 15-155 (1990). Id. at 75, 399 S.”
State v. Singleton, 900 S.E.2d 802 (N.C. 2024).
· cites it 5× “o be proved, nor for omission of the words “as appears by the record,” or of the words “with force and arms,” nor for the insertion of the words “against the form of the Statutes” instead of the words “against the form of the Statute,” or vice versa; nor for omitting to state…”
State v. Young, 406 S.E.2d 3 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991).
“C.G.S. § 15-155 (1990). In cases of sexual assaults on children, temporal specificity requisites diminish.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.