Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 15 — NAVIGATION AND AERONAUTICS · Chapter 263 — Harbors and Rivers
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 15-3 (2025)

Powers of deputies

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Deputy harbor masters shall have all the powers and perform all the duties of harbor masters in the respective harbors for which they are appointed, subject to the control and direction of the harbor masters.

(1949 Rev., S. 4750.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: Moore v. Ganim, 660 A.2d 742 (Conn. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Moore v. Ganim, 660 A.2d 742 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs maintain that the right to subsistence benefits is so fundamental that it was, in the words of one constitutional scholar discussing some commentators’ views of the federal constitution, “deemed [by the framers] too obvious to require elaboration” in the text of…”
Sheiman v. Sheiman, 804 A.2d 983 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 5× “ng with regard to the rules of evidence and trial practice, (2) granted the plaintiffs motion to modify custody without finding a material change in the circumstances and conditions of the parties, (3) denied the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs motion to modify…”
State v. Joyner, 625 A.2d 791 (Conn. 1993). “1988) § 15-3, p. 1310; see also 2 C. Antieau, Modern Constitutional Law (1969) § 15:44.”
Polverari v. Peatt, 614 A.2d 484 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992). “) § 15-3; a nonwillful breach by the plaintiff; Vines v.”
Doe v. Maher, 515 A.2d 134 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1986). “During the 17th and 18th centuries, there evolved an American tradition of ‘natural law,’ postulating that ‘certain principles of right and justice .”
Edgewood Props., LLC v. Dynamic Multimedia, LLC, 319 A.3d 123 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 3× “Additionally, there was discussion regarding the failure of [Martin] to appear [at the second day of the trial] and the [counsel for the] defendants’ oral motion to continue, which was later denied on the record. The trial proceeded without [Martin] present on February 3, 2023.”
State v. Irizarry, 896 A.2d 828 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006). “22 See Practice Book § 15-3. The report was prepared by the investigating officer, Frank Surowiec, in response to a complaint from the defendant’s landlord, Frank Maccarone, regarding an alleged larceny.”
Shiang-Yueng Feng v. Dart Hill Realty, Inc., 601 A.2d 547 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992). “) § 15-3; a nonwillful breach by the plaintiff; Vines v.”
Magsig v. Magsig, 191 A.3d 1053 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). “" 4 Prior to the hearings on the contempt motion, the plaintiff filed a motion in limine, pursuant to Practice Book § 15-3, to preclude the testimony of attorneys Judith Ellenthal and Jill Bicks, who previously had represented the plaintiff and the defendant respectively.”
Matusz v. Wellmore Behavioral Health, Inc., 344 A.3d 208 (Conn. App. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2× “If a case has not yet been assigned for trial, a judicial authority may, for good cause shown, entertain the motion.”
First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. 273 Water Street, LLC, 117 A.3d 857 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). “Prior to trial, the court heard arguments on the plain- tiff’s motion in limine, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 15-3, to preclude the testimony of Farricker.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.