Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 22a — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION · Chapter 446i — Water Resources. Invasive Plants
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-365 (2026)

Short title: Connecticut Water Diversion Policy Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 22a-365 to 22a-378, inclusive, shall be known and may be cited as the “Connecticut Water Diversion Policy Act”.

(P.A. 82-402, S. 1, 16.)

Cited. 28 CA 674.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2022 · leading case: City of Waterbury v. Town of Washington, 800 A.2d 1102 (Conn. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Waterbury v. Town of Washington, 800 A.2d 1102 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 8× “By enacting other statutes regulating the minimum flow of water in stocked watercourses and creating a permitting scheme for water diversions; see General Statutes §§ 26-141a through 26-141c; General Statutes § 22a-365 et seq.; the legislature has implicitly acknowledged that…”
Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. Rocque, 802 A.2d 184 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “On November 5, 1998, the plaintiff filed an application with the commissioner, pursuant to the Connecticut Water Diversion Policy Act, General Statutes §§ 22a-365 to 22a-378, for a permit to divert water and to remove gravel from Miller’s Pond.”
Miller's Pond Co. v. Rocque, 822 A.2d 238 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 4× “otection, appeals 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court concluding that General Statutes § 22a-371 2 affords no discretion *694 to the defendant to decide whether to conduct a hearing regarding the sufficiency of the application by the plaintiff, Miller’s Pond Company, LLC,…”
Dep't of Utils. v. Carothers, 613 A.2d 316 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992). · cites it 2× “General Statutes §§ 22a-365 to 22a-378. A public hearing on the application was held on June 26, 1989, before hearing officer Clyde Fisher.”
Crandle v. Connecticut State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 342 Conn. 67 (Conn. 2022). · cites it 2× “In that case, the defendant, the Commissioner of Envi- ronmental Protection, claimed that the interpretation of the Department of Environmental Protection (depart- ment) of the Connecticut Water Diversion Policy Act, General Statutes § 22a-365 et seq., was entitled to defer-…”
Tilcon Connecticut, Inc. v. Comm'r of Env't Prot. (Conn. 2015). · cites it 2× “, the Commissioner of Environ- mental Protection (commissioner), for a declaratory ruling defining the scope of the authority possessed by the Department of Environmental Protection (depart- ment)1 to request certain information from the plaintiff for its various water diversion…”
Matter of Sierra Club v. Martens, 2018 NY Slip Op 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018). “; see Conn Gen Stat §§ 22a-365 to 22a-379; NJ Stat § 58:1A-1 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.