This chapter shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it.
Lydall, Inc. v. Ruschmeyer, 919 A.2d 421 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 3דLydall’s argument, however, overlooks General Statutes § 35-58, which provides that the provisions of CUTSA “shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it.”
Evans v. Gen. Motors Corp., 893 A.2d 371 (Conn. 2006). · cites it 2דThe conclusion we reach today satisfies the rule of construction that CUTSA “shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this [act] among states enacting it.”
On-Line Tech., Inc. v. Perkin-Elmer Corp., 253 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D. Conn. 2003). · cites it 2דSee Conn. Gen.Stat. § 35-58 ("This chapter shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it.”
Imaginative Rsch. Assocs., Inc. v. Ramirez, 718 F. Supp. 2d 236 (D. Conn. 2010). · cites it 2דFinally, although the case-law is extremely sparse on this point, authority from other states — which provides relevant interpretative guidance in this field, see Conn. Gen.Stat. § 35-58 (“This chapter shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make…”
Krafft v. Downey, 68 A.3d 329 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 2008, or Conn. Gen.Stat. § 35-58. In keeping with this understanding, we have been guided by the reasoning of courts from other jurisdictions, especially since the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court have not spoken on the issues addressed herein.”
Dur-A-Flex, Inc. v. Dy, 349 Conn. 513 (Conn. 2024). · cites it 6ד3d 17 (2011); see also General Statutes § 35-58 (‘‘[t]his chapter shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it’’).”
Speer v. Skaats (Conn. App. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2ד” General Statutes § 35-58 provides that “[t]his chapter shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this chapter among states enacting it.” The legislative history of CUTSA demonstrates that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.