Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 36a — THE BANKING LAW OF CONNECTICUT · Chapter 669 — Regulated Activities
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-675 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 36-416). Short title: Connecticut Truth-in-Lending Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 36a-675 to 36a-686, inclusive, shall be known and may be cited as the “Connecticut Truth-in-Lending Act”.

(1969, P.A. 454, S. 24; P.A. 15-235, S. 1.)

History: Sec. 36-416 transferred to Sec. 36a-675 in 1995; (Revisor's note: In 1997 the Revisors editorially reinstated the word “shall” before the words “be known and may be cited” to correct a clerical error in the preparation of the 1995 revision); P.A. 15-235 added reference to Sec. 36a-686 and replaced “Truth-in-Lending Act” with “Connecticut Truth-in-Lending Act”, effective August 1, 2015.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2011–2022 · leading case: GMAC Mortg., LLC v. Ford, 73 A.3d 742 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
GMAC Mortg., LLC v. Ford, 73 A.3d 742 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “Connecticut has incorporated the federal rescission right into its version of the act, codified at General Statutes §§ 36a-675 through 36a-685.”
Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLC, 156 F. Supp. 3d 274 (D. Conn. 2015). · cites it 2× “, the Connecticut TILA, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 36a-675, 36a-685, and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn.”
Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc., 166 A.3d 857 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 2× “The state's TILA provisions are set forth at General Statutes § 36a-675 et seq. Contrary to this assertion, the plaintiff clearly alleged a violation of CUTPA, § 42-110a et seq.”
Walpole Woodworkers, Inc. v. Manning, 11 A.3d 165 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “Rather, the defendant, relying on an isolated provision in the Truth-In-Lending Act, General Statutes § 36a-675 et seq., maintains that he was entitled to rescind the contract and recoup his $11,000 deposit at any time “within three years of the completion of the transaction”…”
Edwards v. McMillen Capital, LLC (D. Conn. 2021). · cites it 3× “), the Connecticut Truth in Lending Act (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-675, et seq.) and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) ( Conn.”
Edwards v. McMillen Capital, LLC (D. Conn. 2021). · cites it 3× “), the Connecticut Truth in Lending Act (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-675, et seq.) and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) ( Conn.”
Edwards v. McMillen Cap., LLC (2d Cir. 2022). “§§ 1601–1667f (“federal TILA”), the Connecticut Truth in Lending Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 36a-675–36a-686 (“Connecticut TILA), and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.