Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 44-6 (2026)

Room that includes sleeping accommodations, offer or provision of financial discount or benefit for, limitations re

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When offering or providing a room that includes sleeping accommodations, no operator of a hotel, motel or similar lodging may offer or provide a financial discount or benefit for such room that is based upon an hourly rate or an occupancy period that is for a term of twelve hours or less.

(P.A. 23-20, S. 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1991–2003 · leading case: Elec. Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Elec. Co., 403 S.E.2d 291 (N.C. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Elec. Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Elec. Co., 403 S.E.2d 291 (N.C. 1991). · cites it 2× “o furnish or who do furnish labor or material for the building, repairing or altering any house or other improvement on real estate, have a lien on said house and real estate for the amount of such labor done or material furnished, which lien shall be preferred to the mechanic's…”
Scholl v. Westport, No. Cv 02 0187778 (Jan. 7, 2003), 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 397 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2003). · cites it 3× “In their reasons for appeal, the plaintiffs included alleged violations of five specific sections of the standards set forth in section 44-6 of the regulations for the granting of a special permit; 4 four of the requirements for the granting of a site plan in section 44-5.”
Mimms v. Plan. Zoning Comm'n, Westport, No. Cv 0289405 S (Jun. 11, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 5731 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1993). “That task force had reviewed twenty-one potential sites for a composting operation.”
Westporters Who Love Compo v. Pzc, No. Cv93 0135452 S (Feb. 3, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1127 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995). “4 The plaintiff, in her brief dated June 15, 1994, makes the bare assertion that the Commission ignored the standards listed in 44-6. The plaintiff argues that the expansion of the Compo Marina will create an overly used commercial marina and diminish the view of the marina.”
Guimond v. Plan. Zon., Westport, No. Cv-90 0109439 S (Jul. 25, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 6151 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991). “The Westport Zoning Regulations, Section 44-6, Special Permit standards, requires that before the board issue the special permit to insure that the use is in with the zone.”
1515 Summer St. v. Westport plng/zng., No. Cv92 0122349 S (Oct. 30, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9845 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992). “Section 44-6 of the Regulations requires the commission to consider all of the site plan standards and objectives contained in section 44-5 and requires it to take into consideration the public health, safety and general welfare of the community and expressly authorizes it to…”
Floch v. Plan. Zoning Comm., of Westport, No. 311201 (Jun. 27, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 6287 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995). “44-5, Site Plan Standards and Objectives, herein, and shall take into consideration the public health, safety and general welfare and may prescribe reasonable conditions and appropriate safeguards to assure the accomplishment of such standards and objectives.”
Reedy v. Westport Plan. Zoning Comm., No. Cv 98 0168910 (Feb. 16, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 2078 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2000). “" In addition, this section of the Regulations requires that special permits: "(1) Be in conformance with the Town Plan of Development; (2) Not prevent or inhibit the orderly growth and development of the area; (3) Not have a significant adverse effect on adjacent areas located…”
Marion Road Assn. v. Plng. Zon. Com., No. Cv 93 0304365-S (Oct. 24, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10780 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1994). “" Section 44-6 of the regulations, entitled "Special Permit Standards", CT Page 10788 provides in pertinent part: "In reviewing granting any Special Permit, the Commission shall determine that the proposed use conform to the overall intent of these regulations and shall consider…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.