Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 46a — HUMAN RIGHTS · Chapter 814c — Human Rights and Opportunities
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-74 (2025)

(Formerly Sec. 4-61g). State agencies not to permit discriminatory practices in professional or occupational associations, public accommodations or housing or on basis of erased criminal records information

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No state department, board or agency may permit any discriminatory practice in violation of section 46a-59, 46a-64, 46a-64c, 46a-80b to 46a-80e, inclusive, or 46a-80k to 46a-80m, inclusive.

(1969, P.A. 790, S. 6; P.A. 80-422, S. 22; P.A. 90-246, S. 8; P.A. 21-32, S. 29.)

History: P.A. 80-422 rephrased section; Sec. 4-61g transferred to Sec. 46a-74 in 1981; P.A. 90-246 deleted reference to the Public Accommodations Act and substituted reference to Sec. 49a-59, 46a-64 or 46a-64c; P.A. 21-32 added references to Secs. 46a-80b, 46a-80c, 46a-80d, 46a-80e, 46a-80k, 46a-80l and 46a-80m, effective January 1, 2023.

See Secs. 46a-89, 46a-89a, 46a-90a re injunctive relief and damages in cases involving discriminatory public accommodation practices.

See Sec. 46a-94 re appeals.

Annotation to former section 4-61g:

Cited. 165 C. 516.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Thibodeau v. Design Grp. One Architects, LLC, 802 A.2d 731 (Conn. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thibodeau v. Design Grp. One Architects, LLC, 802 A.2d 731 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “ng *722 discriminatory public accommodations practices); General Statutes § 46a-64c (prohibiting discriminatory housing practices); General Statutes § 46a-66 (prohibiting discriminatory credit practices); General Statutes § 46a-70 (guaranteeing equal employment opportunities in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.