Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 04d — STATE INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS · Chapter 61 — State Information and Telecommunication Systems Management and Contracts
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4d-36 (2026)

Nondisclosure of public records by contractor or subcontractor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No contractor or subcontractor, or employee or agent of a contractor or subcontractor, shall disclose to the public any public records (1) which it possesses, modifies or creates pursuant to a contract, subcontract or amendment to a contract or subcontract and (2) which the state agency (A) is prohibited from disclosing pursuant to state or federal law in all cases, (B) may disclose pursuant to state or federal law only to certain entities or individuals or under certain conditions or (C) may withhold from disclosure pursuant to state or federal law. No provision of this section shall be construed to prohibit any such contractor from disclosing such public records to any of its subcontractors to carry out the purposes of its subcontract.

(June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-9, S. 36, 50.)

History: June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-9 effective July 1, 1997 (Revisor's note: The phrase “No provision of this subsection shall be” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “No provision of this section shall be” since this section is a section rather than a subsection).

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: Ames v. Comm'r, 839 A.2d 1250 (Conn. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ames v. Comm'r, 839 A.2d 1250 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 4d-39 (c) (in action by attorney general to prosecute violation under General Statutes §§ 4d-36, 4d-37 or 4d-38, court may “award [inter alia] punitive damages”); General Statutes § 16-8d (b) (in action by employee alleging retaliation for disclosure of…”
Tomick v. United Parcel Serv., Inc. (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 4d-39 (c) (in action by attorney general to prosecute violation under General Statutes §§ 4d-36, 4d-37 or 4d-38, court may ‘award [inter alia] punitive damages’); General Statutes § 16-8d (b) (in action by employee alleging retaliation for disclosure of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.