Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-192 (2025)

Credit for transferred McCook Hospital employees

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Each person who was transferred to state employment under the provisions of section 5-268d of the 1967 supplement to the general statutes shall be credited for retirement purposes for his entire period of full-time service as a city employee. Credit for less than full-time service shall be determined by the State Employees Retirement Commission.

(b) There shall be transferred to the State Employees Retirement Fund from the Municipal Employees' Retirement Fund such amount, for each person transferred, as the State Retirement Commission and the city of Hartford determine to be equitable by reason of the transfer of city employees to the state under the provisions of said section 5-268d.

(c) All rights, benefits and privileges to which members of the state retirement system are entitled, as well as rights, benefits and privileges conferred on state employees which relate to retirement, shall be given to those persons who have transferred to state employment under the provisions of said section 5-268d. All those persons who have so transferred shall be entitled to such accrued vacation and sick time as they earned under city employment.

(1967, P.A. 424, S. 3, 4, 5; 606, S. 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Mickey v. Mickey, 974 A.2d 641 (Conn. 2009).
Mickey v. Mickey, 974 A.2d 641 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 13× “Due to the nature of his job, the defendant potentially was eligible for hazardous duty retirement under General Statutes § 5-192n, [4] and, as with all other state employees enrolled in tier II, also was eligible for normal retirement benefits under General Statutes § 5-192 l,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.