Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 51 — COURTS · Chapter 882 — Superior Court
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-197d (2025)

Jurisdiction of appellate session

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 51-197d is repealed.

(P.A. 77-347, S. 3, 11; P.A. 78-280, S. 85, 127; P.A. 79-376; 79-540, S. 9; P.A. 80-234, S. 2; P.A. 81-416, S. 2, 5; P.A. 82-248, S. 100; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29, S. 80, 82.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: Barausky v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 447 A.2d 758 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barausky v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 447 A.2d 758 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1982). · cites it 16× “General Statutes § 51-197d provides that the Appellate Session of the Superior Court “shall have jurisdiction of appeals from any final judgment .”
Cosenza v. Whitmore, 425 A.2d 949 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). · cites it 3× “In order for this court to hear an appeal, there must be jurisdicton under General Statutes § 51-197d. This section states, in part, that the “appellate session of the superior court shall have jurisdiction of appeals from any final judgment or action in .”
State v. Satti, 454 A.2d 280 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1982). · cites it 2× “*554 Because we can only speculate as to the Supreme Court’s reasons for the denial, its precedential value in severely impaired. Accordingly, we hold today that we are not bound by that decision.”
Shippee v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 451 A.2d 285 (Conn. 1982). · cites it 4× “The issue before us is to determine what effect the 1981 enactment of General Statutes § 51-197d (11) has had on the certification procedure of § 8-8.”
State v. Whitney, 440 A.2d 987 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). · cites it 2× “1 The fact that the defendant has chosen to appeal from the denial of his application before the case has been fully disposed of in the trial court raises a preliminary question of whether his appeal has been taken from “any final judgment or action” as required by General…”
MacCio v. Hundley, 422 A.2d 953 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1980). · cites it 2× “- See General Statutes § 51-197d(2); Practice Book, 1978, § 3001.”
McNeil v. Tyson, 432 A.2d 328 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). “Neither does the statute which delineates the jurisdiction of the Appellate Session, § 51-197d. Under our rules of practice, however, the right of appeal is granted to “a party aggrieved by the decision of the court or judge.”
Grodis v. Burns, 440 A.2d 315 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). · cites it 5× “2 Although the appeal has since been argued on its merits, there is a reason not articulated in the previous motion which requires us to reexamine our jurisdiction over the appeal. The precise question presented is whether an appeal from a judgment in a mandamus action in which…”
Jajer v. Zoning Comm'n, 452 A.2d 122 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1982). · cites it 4× “t granted the motion for the following reasons: (1) there was no requirement of publication of site plan approvals and, therefore, the statute authorizing zoning appeals is inapplicable; (2) since the plaintiffs did not appeal to the zoning board of appeals, they failed to…”
Hayes v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 460 A.2d 501 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1983). · cites it 9× “The jurisdiction of the Appellate Session of the Superior Court is set forth in General Statutes § 51-197d as amended by Public Acts 1981, No.”
Hartford Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Tucker, 436 A.2d 1260 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). · cites it 5× “In particular, the defendant has appealed from an order holding him in contempt,. a denial of his motion to disqualify a judge, a denial of a motion to dismiss and an order appointing a rent receiver.”
State v. Gates, 453 A.2d 781 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1982). · cites it 2× “The jurisdiction of the Appellate Session of the Superior Court is set forth in General Statutes § 51-197d. Subsection (10) thereof authorizes appeals from “[a]ny court order prohibiting any person from attending any session of court.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-197d(2): 1 case
MacCio v. Hundley, 422 A.2d 953 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1980). “- See General Statutes § 51-197d(2); Practice Book, 1978, § 3001.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.