Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-202 (2025)
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 925, Sec. 52-570a.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1960–1979 · leading case: Palmer v. Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 279 A.2d 726 (Conn. 1971).
Palmer v. Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 279 A.2d 726 (Conn. 1971). “1930], § 5640 [now General Statutes § 52-202]." (Emphasis added.”
Elmendorf v. Poprocki, 230 A.2d 1 (Conn. 1967). “The plaintiff claims that a right to maintain the present action exists under § 52-202 of the General Statutes. 1 The plaintiff would have us construe the *121 term “guardian” to include conservators.”
Harris v. Barone, 158 A.2d 855 (Conn. 1960). “General Statutes § 52-202. The defendant filed a motion to dissolve a garnishment by the plaintiff of funds allegedly due the estate in compromise of a suit to recover for the wrongful death of the decedent.”
Mees v. Winthrop Bank & Trust Co., 332 A.2d 791 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1974). “Restatement (Second), 2 Trusts § 271 A. In this case it appears that the alleged negligence was a common incident of the land of business activity in which the administrator or its predecessor was properly engaged for the trust.”
Difrancesca v. Rousseau, 409 A.2d 1252 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1979). “Prior to the passage of § 52-202 of the General Statutes, the exclusive remedy of such a post mortem creditor was an action against the fiduciary personally.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.