Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 53a — PENAL CODE · Chapter 952 — Penal Code: Offenses
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-129d (2026)

Identity theft in the third degree: Class D felony

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) A person is guilty of identity theft in the third degree when such person commits identity theft, as defined in section 53a-129a.

(b) Identity theft in the third degree is a class D felony.

(P.A. 03-156, S. 4.)

Convictions under this section, Sec. 53a-128d(2) and Sec. 53a-125b do not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. 326 C. 310.

Conviction under this section and Secs. 53a-128d and 53a-129b for single course of conduct does not constitute double jeopardy. 119 CA 483.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2022 · leading case: State v. Bozelko, 987 A.2d 1102 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bozelko, 987 A.2d 1102 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 7× “In docket number CR-05-128811, the defendant was convicted of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124; identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d; illegal use of a credit card in violation of § 53a-128d; and…”
State v. Schovanec, 163 A.3d 581 (Conn. 2017). · cites it 4× “The defendant, Frank Schovanec, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d, credit card theft in violation of General Statutes § 53a-128c(a), illegal use of a credit…”
State v. Sweet, 214 Conn. App. 679 (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 5× “Sweet, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124 (a) (2),1 and one count of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d (a).”
State v. Jerrell R., 202 A.3d 1044 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “3d 581 , the defendant was convicted of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d, credit card theft in violation of General Statutes § 53a-128c (a), illegal use of a credit card in violation of General Statutes § 53a-128d (2), and larceny in…”
State v. Schiller, 972 A.2d 272 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 4× “to 2003) § 53a-129a and five counts of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and (2) the state’s improper comments *191 during closing…”
State v. Reynolds, 11 A.3d 198 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “” General Statutes § 53a-129d provides: “(a) A person is guilty of identity theft in the third degree when such person commits identity theft, as defined in section 53a-129a.”
State v. Palmenta, 144 A.3d 503 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “CR-07-125614-S, the defendant [pleaded] guilty to burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 ; identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d ; and larceny in the fifth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125.”
State v. Hudson, 998 A.2d 1272 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “Hudson, with two counts of credit card theft in violation of General Statutes § 53a-128c (a), three counts of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d (a) and three counts of credit card forgery in violation of General Statutes § 53a-128c…”
State v. Thompson, 996 A.2d 1218 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 4× “[5] NOTES [1] The defendant was found not guilty of ten counts of identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d and one count of identity theft in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129c(a).”
Bozelko v. Comm'r of Corr., 196 Conn. App. 627 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 2× “1 The petitioner was convicted, after a jury trial, of attempt to commit larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-122 and 53a-49; larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a- 124; two counts of larceny in the fifth degree in…”
State v. Bozelko (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 3× “In docket number CR-05-128811, the defendant was convicted of larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-124; identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d; illegal use of a credit card in violation of § 53a- 128d; and…”
Palmenta v. Comm'r of Corr. (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “He also pleaded guilty in docket number CR-07-125614 to burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103, iden- tity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-129d, and larceny in the fifth degree in violation of General Statutes §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.