(a) Whenever a program or project undertaken by a state agency or under the supervision of a state agency will result in the displacement of any person on or after July 6, 1971, the head of such state agency shall make payment to any displaced person, upon proper application as approved by such agency head, for (1) actual reasonable expenses in moving himself, his family, business, farm operation or other personal property, (2) actual direct losses of tangible personal property as a result of moving or discontinuing a business or farm operation, but not to exceed an amount equal to the reasonable expenses that would have been required to relocate such property, as determined by the state agency, and (3) actual reasonable expenses in searching for a replacement business or farm, provided, whenever any tenant in any dwelling unit is displaced as the result of the enforcement of any code to which this section is applicable by any town, city or borough or agency thereof, the landlord of such dwelling unit shall be liable for any payments made by such town, city or borough pursuant to this section or by the state pursuant to subsection (b) of section
8-280, and the town, city or borough or the state may place a lien on any real property owned by such landlord to secure repayment to the town, city or borough or the state of such payments, which lien shall have the same priority as and shall be filed, enforced and discharged in the same manner as a lien for municipal taxes under chapter 205.
(b) Any displaced person eligible for payments under subsection (a) of this section who is displaced from a dwelling and who elects to accept the payments authorized by this subsection in lieu of the payments authorized by subsection (a) of this section may receive a moving expense allowance, determined according to a schedule established by the state agency, not to exceed three hundred dollars and a dislocation allowance of two hundred dollars.
(c) Any displaced person eligible for payments under subsection (a) of this section who is displaced from the person's place of business or from the person's farm operation and who elects to accept the payment authorized by this subsection in lieu of the payment authorized by subsection (a) of this section, may receive a fixed payment in an amount equal to the average annual net earnings of the business or farm operation, except that such payment shall not be less than two thousand five hundred dollars nor more than ten thousand dollars. In the case of a business no payment shall be made under this subsection unless the state agency is satisfied that the business (1) cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of its existing patronage, and (2) is not a part of a commercial enterprise having at least one other establishment not being acquired by the state, which is engaged in the same or similar business. For purposes of this subsection, “average annual net earnings” means one half of any net earnings of the business or farm operation, before federal, state and local income taxes, during the two taxable years immediately preceding the taxable year in which such business or farm operation moves from the real property acquired for such project, or during such other period as such agency determines to be more equitable for establishing such earnings, and includes any compensation paid by the business or farm operation to the owner, the owner's spouse or the owner's dependents during such period.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, in the case of displacement of a person on or after October 1, 2007, because of acquisition of real property by a redevelopment agency pursuant to section 8-128, a development agency pursuant to section 8-193, or an implementing agency pursuant to section 32-224, pursuant to a redevelopment plan approved under chapter 130 or a development plan approved under chapter 132 or 588l, the agency shall make relocation payments as provided under the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 USC 4601 et seq. and any subsequent amendments thereto and regulations promulgated thereunder if payments under said act and regulations would be greater than payments under this section and sections 8-269 and 8-270.
(1971, P.A. 838, S. 3; P.A. 79-518, S. 2, 6; P.A. 82-399, S. 1; P.A. 86-307, S. 8, 12; P.A. 05-288, S. 46; P.A. 07-141, S. 13.)
History: P.A. 79-518 amended Subsec. (a) by adding reference to programs or projects supervised by state agency and deleting reference to “acquisition of real property for” such programs or projects; P.A. 82-399 amended Subsec. (a) to provide for the liability of the landlord in certain code enforcement cases; P.A. 86-307 amended Subsec. (a) to make landlord liable for any payments made “by the state pursuant to subsection (b) of section 8-280” and to allow state to place lien on real property owned by landlord to secure repayment; P.A. 05-288 made a technical change in Subsec. (a), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 07-141 made technical changes in Subsec. (c) and added Subsec. (d) re displacement assistance pursuant to federal requirements because of acquisition pursuant to Sec. 8-128, 8-193 or 32-224, effective October 1, 2007, and applicable to property acquired on or after that date.
Cited. 192 C. 207; 233 C. 296.
Cited. 5 CA 219; 19 CA 360. Issue of reimbursement expenses for business relocation is outside scope of compensation for the taking of real property and not an essential term of settlement agreement pursuant to Sec. 13a-76. 189 CA 828.
Cited. 43 CS 457.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
14
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case:
Dukes v. Durante, 471 A.2d 1368 (Conn. 1984).
Dukes v. Durante, 471 A.2d 1368 (Conn. 1984).
· cites it 7× “In 1982, the legislature amended General Statutes §§ 8-268 and 8-270 and added § 8-270a to provide that cities could seek reimbursement from landlords for that assistance provided to tenants displaced by code enforcement.”
Plastic Distributors, Inc. v. Burns, 497 A.2d 1005 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985).
· cites it 8× “The plaintiff applied for reimbursement under the URAA; General Statutes § 8-268 (a); 1 for moving expenses, including rental payments at the Hartford and the East Windsor sites for the entire six-week moving period, and payments for the utilities at both sites for the period…”
Comm'r of Transp. v. Rocky Mountain, LLC, 894 A.2d 259 (Conn. 2006).
· cites it 2× “General Statutes § 8-268. If a business seeks to contest the amount of compensation *710 offered by the state, the state relocation act requires an appeal to the acquiring agency; General Statutes § 8-278; followed by an administrative appeal to the Superior Court pursuant to…”
Silverman v. City of New Haven, 562 A.2d 562 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989).
· cites it 2× “) in dismissing the action on the ground that it was without jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, and (2) in construing § 8-273-1 of the regulations of Connecticut state agencies as imposing a limi *362…”
Comm'r of Transp. v. Lagosz, 209 A.3d 709 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019).
· cites it 4× “Rather, the defendant takes issue with the compensation for business relocation expenses, which fall under the purview of General Statutes §§ 8-268 and 8-278, not § 13a-76.”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 18× “) General Statutes § 8-268 (a); accord General Statutes § 8-270 (a); see also P.”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 16× “) General Statutes § 8-268 (a); accord General Statutes § 8-270 (a); see also P.”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 15× “) General Statutes § 8-268 (a); accord General Statutes § 8-270 (a); see also P.”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford, 350 Conn. 347 (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 18× “) General Statutes § 8-268 (a); accord General Statutes § 8-270 (a); see also P.”
DeMilo & Co. v. Dep't of Transp., 658 A.2d 170 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1993).
· cites it 2× “Thus, General Statutes §§ 8-268, 8-271, 8-273, 8-273a and 8-278 provide the statutory scheme under which transportation is obligated to compensate persons who are displaced from their homes or businesses as the result of departmental projects, such as the expansion of Interstate…”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford (Concurrence) (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 5× “I agree with the majority’s construction of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (URAA), General Statutes §§ 8-266 through 8-282, and its conclusion that the affirmative defense in General Statutes § 8-270a is applicable only in a civil action for the reimbursement of…”
PPC Realty, LLC v. Hartford (Concurrence) (Conn. 2024).
· cites it 4× “ree with the majority’s con- struction of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act (URAA), General Statutes §§ 8-266 through 8-282, and its conclu- sion that the affirmative defense in General Statutes § 8-270a is applicable only in a civil action for the reim- bursement of…”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-268(a): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.