Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 08 — · Chapter 128 — Department of Housing: Municipal Housing Projects
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-51 (2025)

Zoning and building laws

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Each housing project of an authority shall be subject to the planning, zoning, sanitary and building laws, ordinances and regulations applicable to the locality in which such project is situated.

(1949 Rev., S. 933.)

Cited. 213 C. 354; 216 C. 112.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1990–2020 · leading case: Connelly v. Hous. Auth. of New Haven, 567 A.2d 1212 (Conn. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Connelly v. Hous. Auth. of New Haven, 567 A.2d 1212 (Conn. 1990). “fixes maximum income limit, and prohibits disqualification of applicants on the ground that the household contains illegitimate children; § 8-45a, which prohibits a housing authority from refusing to rent accommodations to otherwise qualified applicants on the ground the…”
City of Norwich v. Hous. Auth. of Norwich, 579 A.2d 50 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 2× “ral Statutes § 8-39 (providing for the housing authorities’ area of operation); General Statutes §§ 8-41 and 8-43 (conferring on the chief executive officer of the municipality the power to appoint and remove housing authority commissioners); General Statutes § 8-44b (providing…”
Breedlove ex rel. Howard v. AEROTRIM, 543 S.E.2d 213 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). “C.G.S. § 8-51, now codified as Rule 601(c) of the Rules of Evidence, N.”
Matter of Will of Lamparter, 497 S.E.2d 692 (N.C. 1998). “The jury found that the eight-page undated memorandum was indeed the last will and testament of the decedent, and on 15 December 1995, judgment was entered reflecting this verdict.”
Weeks v. Jackson, 700 S.E.2d 45 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 8-51 excluded evidence of “oral communications or transactions.”
Crosland v. Patrick, 849 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020). “C.G.S. § 8-51 and now codified in Rule 601(c) of the Rules of Evidence, N.”
Crosland v. Patrick, 849 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020). “C.G.S. § 8-51 and now codified in Rule 601(c) of the Rules of Evidence, N.”
Crosland v. Patrick, 849 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020). “C.G.S. § 8-51 and now codified in Rule 601(c) of the Rules of Evidence, N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.