Del. C. » Title 10 — Organization, Powers, Jurisdiction and Operation of Courts · CHAPTER 3. Court of Chancery · Courts and Judicial Procedure
Delaware Code

10 Del. C. § 369 (2026)

Issues of fact triable by jury

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When matters of fact, proper to be tried by a jury, arise in any cause depending in Chancery, the Court of Chancery may order such facts to trial by issues at the Bar of the Superior Court.

Code 1852, §  1933;  Code 1915, §  3844;  Code 1935, §  4367;  10 Del. C. 1953, §  369; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1967–2024 · leading case: Melson v. Court of Chancery of the State, 234 A.2d 440 (Del. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Melson v. Court of Chancery of the State, 234 A.2d 440 (Del. 1967). “10 Del.C. § 369 provides as follows: “§ 369.”
In re TransPerfect Global, Inc., No. C.A. Nos. 9700, 10449-CB (Del. Ch. Apr. 14, 2021). “See 10 Del. C. § 369 (“When matters of fact, proper to be tried by a jury, arise in any cause depending in Chancery, the Court of Chancery may order such facts to trial by issues at the Bar of the Superior Court.”
FirstString Rsch., Inc. v. JSS Med. Rsch. Inc., No. C.A. No. 2020-0332-KSJM (Del. Ch. May 28, 2021). “1950) (collecting cases); see also 10 Del. C. § 369 (codifying Saunders, providing that “[w]hen matters of fact, proper to be tried by a jury, arise in any cause depending in Chancery, the Court of Chancery may order such facts to trial by issues at the Bar of the Superior…”
Transperfect Global, Inc. v. Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, No. C.A. No. 2021-0065-KSJM (Del. Ch. Mar. 17, 2022). “”91 89 Preston Hollow Cap. LLC v. Nuveen LLC, 216 A.”
Goldstein v. Denner, 310 A.3d 548 (Del. Ch. 2024). “10 Del. C. § 369 (“When matters of fact, proper to be tried by a jury, arise in any cause depending in Chancery, the Court of Chancery may order such facts to trial by issues at the Bar of the Superior Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.