Delaware Code

6 Del. C. § 1-202 (2026)

Notice; knowledge

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Subject to subsection (f), a person has “notice” of a fact if the person:

(1) Has actual knowledge of it;

(2) Has received a notice or notification of it; or

(3) From all the facts and circumstances known to the person at the time in question, has reason to know that it exists.

(b) “Knowledge” means actual knowledge. “Knows” has a corresponding meaning.

(c) “Discover”, “learn”, or words of similar import refer to knowledge rather than to reason to know.

(d) A person “notifies” or “gives” a notice or notification to another person by taking such steps as may be reasonably required to inform the other person in ordinary course, whether or not the other person actually comes to know of it.

(e) Subject to subsection (f), a person “receives” a notice or notification when:

(1) It comes to that person’s attention; or

(2) It is duly delivered in a form reasonable under the circumstances at the place of business through which the contract was made or at another location held out by that person as the place for receipt of such communications.

(f) Notice, knowledge, or a notice or notification received by an organization is effective for a particular transaction from the time it is brought to the attention of the individual conducting that transaction and, in any event, from the time it would have been brought to the individual’s attention if the organization had exercised due diligence. An organization exercises due diligence if it maintains reasonable routines for communicating significant information to the person conducting the transaction and there is reasonable compliance with the routines. Due diligence does not require an individual acting for the organization to communicate information unless the communication is part of the individual’s regular duties or the individual has reason to know of the transaction and that the transaction would be materially affected by the information.

5A Del. C. 1953, §§  1-20155 Del. Laws, c. 34964 Del. Laws, c. 152, §  268 Del. Laws, c. 249, §  370 Del. Laws, c. 86, §  172 Del. Laws, c. 401, §§  3-573 Del. Laws, c. 329, §  573 Del. Laws, c. 330, §  274 Del. Laws, c. 332, §  1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2018 · leading case: Shawe v. Elting, 157 A.3d 152 (Del. 2017).
Shawe v. Elting, 157 A.3d 152 (Del. 2017). “Section 202(c) describes various types of restrictions on transfers of securities which are permissible under that Section.”
Anthony Miele, III v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (9th Cir. 2018). · cites it 3× “” 6 Del. C. § 1-202(a)(3); see also Hercules Inc.”
— 6 Del. C. § 1-202(a)(3) — 1 case
Anthony Miele, III v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (9th Cir. 2018). “” 6 Del. C. § 1-202(a)(3); see also Hercules Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.