Delaware Code
6 Del. C. § 1310 (2026)
Supplementary provisions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Unless displaced by the provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency or other validating or invalidating cause, supplement its provisions.
70 Del. Laws, c. 434, § 1;Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1953–2019 · leading case: Crystallex Int'l Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A., 879 F.3d 79 (3rd Cir. 2018).
Crystallex Int'l Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A., 879 F.3d 79 (3rd Cir. 2018). “25 6 Del. C. § 1310. 26 Id. § 1307(a)(3)(c).”
Crystallex Int'l Corp. v. Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., 213 F. Supp. 3d 683 (D. Del. 2016). “” 6 Del. C. § 1310. The Court has already concluded that the Complaint alleges a fraudulent transfer to which PDVH was a direct party, making it an appropriate defendant in this case.”
Getty Refining & Mktg. Co. v. Park Oil, Inc., 385 A.2d 147 (Del. Ch. 1978). “The short answer would seem to be that both traditional equity jurisdiction and 6 Del.C. § 1310 authorize an action of this type.”
Applied Energetics, Inc. v. George Farley & AnneMarieCo, LLC (Del. Ch. 2019). “144 See 6 Del. C. § 1310 (“Unless displaced by the provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency or other…”
Applied Energetics, Inc. v. George Farley & AnneMarieCo, LLC (Del. Ch. 2019). “144 See 6 Del. C. § 1310 (“Unless displaced by the provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relating to principal and agent, estoppel, laches, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, insolvency or other…”
CMS Inv. Holdings, LLC v. Castle (Del. Ch. 2015). “…Castle, Stawiarski, and Wilson-Harvey. In all other respects, Defendants‘ Motions are denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. 131 6 Del. C. § 1310. 61”
EM Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. Int., 98 A.2d 506 (Del. Ch. 1953). “This is one of the alternative forms of relief provided by the Fraudulent Conveyance Act, 6 Del.C. § 1310. It is apparent, however, that plaintiff has no particular interest in the type of assets made available for the ultimate satisfaction of its judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.