Paul v. State, 735 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Paul v. State, 735 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Mitchell Stukel v. State of Florida, 251 So. 3d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Bennith PAUL
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 99-646.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 16, 1999.
Published opinion
735 So. 2d 572
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7894
1999 WL 391891
Bennith Paul, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Gersten, Green, Schwartz.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

As the state correctly asserts, because the trial judge was aware of the recommended sentencing guidelines and the sentences imposed for the appellant’s non-capital offenses did not exceed the recommended guidelines, the court’s failure to use a scoresheet did not constitute reversible error. See Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313, 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The court’s failure to use a scoresheet in this case was[*573] harmless — at best. See Hamilton v. State, 537 So.2d 194, 194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Williams v. State, 529 So.2d 366, 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore affirm the order denying the appellant’s motion made pursuant to rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Affirmed.