Defining fundamental error and its harmful nature
Also stated as: Determining substantial and injurious effect of error
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Defining fundamental error and its harmful nature
- Cited for: Determining fundamental error in order to show cause
- Cited for: Determining fundamental error when essential element is unproven
- Cited for: Defining and applying the concept of fundamental error
- Cited for: Determining if error rises to fundamental level
- Cited for: Determining substantial influence of an error
Ranked by how often Florida courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Florida opinions citing these pages
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Named doctrine
The doctrine as Florida courts name it, with the cases on each side (State Issue Map).
Nearest issues
- 24 opinions
- 54 opinions
- 77 opinions
- 5 opinions
- 16 opinions
- 31 opinions
- 39 opinions
Filed under: Harmless and Plain Error Analysis
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law