The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Therefore, "about 6.6 × 1011 particles per ml" encompasses of a range of at most from 5.94 × 1011 to 7.26 . . . coefficient, the Board found no concentrations disclosed in the '575 disclosure were between 5.94 × 1011 and 7.26 . . . limitation "about 6.6 × 1011 particles per ml" encompasses of a range of at most from 5.94 × 1011 to 7.26 . . . range overlaps with the claimed range of "about 6.6 × 1011 particles per ml" or from 5.94 × 1011 to 7.26 . . .
. . . Although all employers must pay their employees a minimum wage of at least $7.26 per hour, id., the FLSA . . .
. . . The FLSA requires covered employers to pay employees a minimum wage of $7.26 per hour during the relevant . . .
. . . method, such as Constancio and Ruiz, experienced numerous'weeks-in which their salaries fell below the $7.26 . . .
. . . of Solicitation for the construction of an embassy compound at Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, on a 7.26 . . .
. . . Instead, according to Plaintiff, Defendants should pay damages for the full $7.26 federal minimum wage . . . According to Defendants, Plaintiffs argument they should pay the full $7.26 per hour for these hours . . .
. . . of Solicitation for the construction of an embassy compound at Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, on a 7.26 . . .
. . . Johnson’s brother, James Johnson, owned 7.26% of Paramount’s common shares. Dkt. #108, Ex. 1 at 13. . . .
. . . . § 701(a); 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 7.26; see 17 U.S.C. § 701(b)(2) (“[T]he Register of Copyrights shall . . .
. . . The nationwide class comprised nearly 7.26 million persons who, with certain exclusions not relevant . . . Class counsel calculated this amount by multiplying the number of class members (7.26 million) by the . . .
. . . probation, five years’ debarment from public work in New York, and restitution of up to approximately $7.26 . . .
. . . As a server, Plaintiff was paid an hourly wage of $3.63 and an overtime hourly wage of $7.26. . . . aware that, as a tipped employee, he received an hourly wage of $3.63/hour (and an overtime rate of $7.26 . . .
. . . whose wages changed over time, the hourly employees who worked in Saxon’s store earned an average of $7.26 . . . employees whose wages changed over time, nonexempt employees received an average hourly wage of only $7.26 . . .
. . . the preponderance of the evidence showed that Gomez should be held accountable for sixteen pounds or 7.26 . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions, 7.26 (4th ed. 2005). . . .
. . . Professor Orr requested that pages 9-26, which is the entirety of chapter one and totals 7.26% of the . . .
. . . Commission disbursed $5.35 billion in support of universal service; by 2009, that number had risen to $7.26 . . . In 2009, total expenditures under that fund totaled $4.3 billion of the $7.26 billion Program. . . .
. . . . § 7.26 The Court must then exercise its discretion to determine whether class certification is appropriate . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions, 7.26 (4th ed.2005). . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions, 7.26 (4th ed.2005). . . .
. . . Newberg, New-berg on Class Actions § 7.26 (4th ed. 2005)). . . .
. . . .) § 7.26. B. . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions, 7.26 (4th ed.2005). . . .
. . . issues presented by plaintiffs complaints.” 2 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newbergon Class Actions § 7.26 . . .
. . . CRS then sent Hunt a letter demanding payment of the check, along with a $35 service charge, and $7.26 . . .
. . . CRS then sent Hunt a letter demanding payment of the check, along with a $35 service charge, and $7.26 . . .
. . . In aggregate, Rodriguez’s estimate amounted to as much as 7.26 kilograms of methamphetamine. . . . objected to the portion of the PSR that included Rodriguez’s statements that he had possessed up to 7.26 . . .
. . . prevent dismissals from interfering with realizing the statutory policy.” 2 Perritt at 71, Section 7.26 . . .
. . . December 6, 2005, includes a demand for the check amount, a “Mise.” charge of $35.00, and interest of $7.26 . . .
. . . December 6, 2005, included a demand for the check amount, a “Mise.” charge of $35.00, and interest of $7.26 . . . December 2, 2005, Defendant demanded the check amount, a “Mise.” charge of $35.00, and interest of $7.26 . . . December 6, 2005, Defendant demanded the check amount, a “Mise.” charge of $35.00, and interest of $7.26 . . .
. . . .............................208 7.25 Compliance with QSF Regulations...........................209 7.26 . . . Statement” to the Asbestos PI Trustees in accordance with Treasury Regulations section 1.468B-3(e). 7.26 . . .
. . . Id. at § 7.26 The Court must then exercise its discretion to determine whether class certification is . . .
. . . . ¶ 27 (warrants, convertible if stock trades higher than $7.26/share for five consecutive trading days . . .
. . . (JPTO ¶ 7.26; Tr. at 204, 306-07, 323; PX V-16.) . . .
. . . to the PSR, methamphetamine transactions between Caballero, Land, and Salmas resulted in the sale of 7.26 . . .
. . . Maximus' Texas Health Steps toll-free line had an average abandonment rate of 8.58% for 2004, up from 7.26% . . .
. . . J.B., 186 F.3d at 1290, n. 7 (quoting 2 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 7.26 . . .
. . . Sears also reported that year-over-year delinquencies decreased from 7.26% to 6.87%, “indicating stable . . . Sears reported that delinquencies had “decreased 39 basis points” in 2002 compared with 2001 (from 7.26% . . .
. . . decision, as petitioner points out, may well have been resolved under the “palpable error” standard of RCr 7.26 . . .
. . . Actuarial present value of future service 4.81 6.63 7.26 7.19 5. . . . Average present value of future service 4.81 6.63 7.26 7.19 H. . . . Average present value of future service 4.81 6.63 7.26 7.19 F. . . .
. . . prevent dismissals from interfering with realizing the statutory policy.” 2 Perritt at 71, Section 7.26 . . .
. . . efficiencies were captured by this transaction, the thresholds for rate regulation would only rise 7.26% . . .
. . . See 2 Herbert Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 7.26 (3d ed.1992). . . . Allied Maintenance Corp., 574 F.2d 656, 661 n. 15 (2d Cir.1978); Newberg & Conte, supra, at § 7.26. . . . Newberg & Conte, supra, at § 7.26 (citing cases). . . . .
. . . Andrade Third Consolidated Complaint, ¶7.26. . . .
. . . McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §§ 3.01[1], 7.26, at 3-2, 7-113 (3d ed.1994) . . .
. . . McCarthy on Trademarks, § 7.26[3][e][ii]. . . . McCarthy on Trademarks, § 7.26[3][e][ii]. . . .
. . . See Complaint ¶¶ 7.01-7.26. . . . Complaint ¶ 7.26. . . . .
. . . vote in South Houston; 9.38 percent of the vote in Rayburn; 14.64 percent of the vote in Dobie; and 7.26 . . .
. . . has the burden of proving nonfunctionality of its asserted trademark or trade dress.” 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . .
. . . features of trade dress are not entitled to trademark protection under the Lanham Act. 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . . exclusive trade dress right to one of those alternatives will not impair free competition. 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . .
. . . He earned between $6.50 and $7.26 per hour and worked at least forty hours per week. . . .
. . . 1 McCarthy § 7.26[3][b]. . . . See also 1 McCarthy § 7.26[3][e] (“the availability of alternative designs is a very important, if not . . .
. . . See Lundin, Keith, M., Chapter 13 Bankruptcy vol. 2, § 7.26, at 7-47 (2d ed. 1994). . . .
. . . McCarthy § 7.26[3][d] (discussing split in the circuits concerning burden of proving functionality/nonfunctionality . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 7.26[1] (3d ed. 1993) (hereinafter " . . .
. . . Lamp Co., 247 F.2d 730, 732 (3d Cir.1957); McCarthy, supra, § 7.26[1]; Dratler, supra, 1988 U.Ill.L.Rev . . .
. . . the Secretary of the Treasury) prohibit the disclosure of alcohol content on beer labels. 27 CFR § 7.26 . . . Ibid.; see also §§7.26(b)-(d). . . . BATF has suspended § 7.26 to comply with the District Court’s order enjoining the enforcement of that . . .
. . . Functional features are not susceptible of protection as trademarks or trade dress. 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . . results from a comparatively simple, cheap or superior method of manufacturing the article. 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . . if certain functional benefits cannot be duplicated through the use of other designs.” 1 McCarthy § 7.26 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks § 7.26[3][a] (1992). . . .
. . . remain available in the industry” and the color is not “functional”); see also 1 McCarthy §§3.01[1], 7.26 . . .
. . . perceived by customers as an indicia [sic] of origin”); cf. 1 McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 7.26 . . .
. . . . & Regs. tit. 6 § 235; Cal.Code Regs. tit. 17 div. 3.1(8.5)(1) § 94502; Mass.Regs.Code tit. 310 § 7.26 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 7.26 (3d ed. 1992). . . .
. . . . § 7.26(a) which provides that ”[t]he alcoholic content and the percentage and quantity of the original . . .
. . . See supra ¶¶ 6.4(f), 7.21. 7.26 The court also rejects the Eagles’ contention that the licensing payments . . . White, 822 F.Supp. ¶ 7.26, at 1431 (citing Alexander, 1977-2 Trade Cas. . . .
. . . determination of the constitutionality of certain agency procedures, the court’s decision was not advisory). 7.26 . . .
. . . during the period from August of 1990, to December of 1992, the monthly Treasury Bill rates ranged from 7.26% . . .
. . . operations of the county office” and executes the policies established by the county committee. 7 CFR § 7.26 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.26 at 128-32 (2d ed. 1979). See also Morton v. . . .
. . . Larkin, Military Evidence § 7.26 at 153 n.86 (2d ed.1978). . . .
. . . This Rule, codified at N.J.Admin.Code tit. 7, § 7.26-6.5(k)(3), became effective on October 7, 1985, . . .
. . . . §§ 7.4 to 7.15 and 7.26(a); Publication 22-PM, Part 5, H 90; 9 Harl.Agricultural Law § 63.07[1], pp . . . . § 7.21(b); and (c) authority to staff County offices to the County Executive Director, 7 C.F.R. § 7.26 . . .
. . . 7.21(b), and is responsible for carrying out the policies established by the county committee. 7 CFR § 7.26 . . . Hamlet as a County Program Assistant, a position in the county office. 7 CFR § 7.26(b). . . .
. . . This increased to 7.26% the following year. . . .
. . . See, 7 CFR 7.26, 7.29-7.34 (1983). . . .
. . . On July 23 the silver market opened at a price of $7.26 and proceeded to rise in price rapidly for the . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7.26 (2d ed. 1979). . . .
. . . See also Davis, §§ 7.26, 9.7 (same). . . .
. . . .* 1/4/82-7/23/82 III 36.3 80% 7.26 x $125 = $ 908. 4. . . .
. . . During 1977, $4.75 to $7.26 per hour. d. During 1978, $980.00 to $1,371.00 per month. e. . . . When the maximum wage specified for General Accountant in 1977 ($7.26) is multiplied by this percentage . . .
. . . as unique or a distinctive symbol of origin,” citing McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 7.26 . . .
. . . dollar Euro-bond offering by Michelin Canada in February of 1969 would have have been approximately 7.26 . . . dollar Eurobond offering by Transocean Gulf in February 1970 in the amount of $30 million at a rate of 7.26 . . . expenses, the total of which he expressed as approximately 30 base points or .30 percent added to the 7.26 . . .
. . . following overall returns: RP78-52 Amount Ratio Cost Weighted Cost Long-Term Debt $ 710,082,000 43.2% 7.26% . . .
. . . In Legislative District 43, the vote was approximately 54 percent against the Initiative. 7.26 Initiative . . .
. . . Greaser testified that American enjoyed a net earning for the year of 1977 of $7.26 per share, and this . . .
. . . decimal point in the calculation of Ira’s and Monetta’s share for 1964, in that year appellant claimed $7.26 . . .
. . . , Child 6-12, Family of 2 26.89 Clothing, Adult, Family of 2 7.50 Clothing, Child 6-12, Family of 2 7.26 . . .
. . . See Anderson, R.M., American Law of Zoning § 7.26 (2d ed 1968). . . .
. . . Announced Order Price Proposed Price Bracketed Price Difference Change in Value Sept. ’69 22,723,613 $7.26 . . .
. . . reflect divestiture of that division alone would result in an adjusted base period profit margin of 7.26% . . . profit margin beyond that previously granted for establishing a 1972 profit margin limitation from 7.26% . . . with the April 2, 1973 decision and order should increase the company’s profit margin from 6.64% to 7.26% . . . Responding to the administrative determination that it was enough that the profit margin of 7.26% was . . . It complains that the Council did not even attempt to explain why it concluded that 7.26% was a fair . . .
. . . profit margin limitation, increased Tasty’s Phase II base period profit margin from 6.64 percent to 7.26 . . .
. . . following results: % Black Students Average Years in Boston Schools 90-100% 5.67 80- 90% 5.02 70- 80% 7.26 . . .
. . . 73 30.78 201.72 1971 Physiotherapy (McKeesport Hospital) 6 treatments 60.00 Travel 6 trips at $1.21 7.26 . . .
. . . $47,295.85 $6.19 7.57 9.28 1961 — 4th $2.00 2.50 3.00 $21,708.47 10,854 8,683 7,236 $63,925.17 $5.80 7.26 . . .
. . . appraised value of C$9.57 per unit consists of C$2.31 per unit, which plaintiff does not contest, plus C$7.26 . . .
. . . Federal Government cannot question the failure to perform assessment work.” 2 American Law of Mining, § 7.26 . . .
. . . in tlie amount of $7,713.78, a life insurance policy in tbe face amount of $5,475 (and dividend of $7.26 . . .
. . . pence % inch x 72 yds. 3.63 pence 4.23 pence J4 inch x 72 yds. 4.84 pence 6.64 pence Yi inch x 72 yds. 7.26 . . .
. . . .— 80 " Cellulose.. 19.70 120 “ “ 22.65 Colours plus.. 7.72 Embossing plus. 2.50 $6.98 7.26 7.60 8.20 . . .
. . . At that time the petitioner was 73 years old, and her life expectancy was 7.26 years. . . .