Florida Statute 7.26 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.26

¹7.26 Hendry County.—The boundary lines of Hendry County are as follows: Beginning where the north line of township forty-three south, intersects the range line between ranges twenty-seven and twenty-eight east, at the line between Charlotte and Glades Counties; thence south on said range line to the north line of township forty-six south; thence east on the north line of township forty-six south, to the east line of range thirty east; thence south on said east line of range thirty east, to the north line of township forty-nine south; thence east on said north line of township forty-nine south, to the east line of range thirty-four east, and the west boundary of Broward County; thence north on said east line of range thirty-four east, concurrent with the west boundary of Broward and Palm Beach Counties, to where said east line intersects the south shore of Lake Okeechobee; thence due north on said east line of range thirty-four east, to the northeast corner of section thirty-six, township forty south, range thirty-four east; thence southwesterly in a straight course to a point two miles east of the range line between ranges thirty-three and thirty-four east, on the line between townships forty-two and forty-three south; thence west on the north line of township forty-three south, to the southwest corner of section thirty-three, township forty-two south, range twenty-nine east; thence north on the west line of said section thirty-three to the northwest corner of said section thirty-three; thence west on the north boundary line of sections thirty-two and thirty-one of township forty-two south, range twenty-nine east, to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of section thirty-one in said township and range; thence south on the middle section line of said section thirty-one to the north line of township forty-three south; thence west on said township line to the place of beginning.

The existing boundaries of Hendry County are hereby enlarged and extended so as to comprise and include the following described additional territory: Begin on the county line between Hendry and Glades County, on the south line of Section 36, Township 42 South, Range 29 East, at a point 2572.81 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said Section 36, thence from a tangent bearing of north 73 °20′59″ East run northeasterly along a curve concaved to the southeast having a radius of 1196.28 feet through a central angle of 16°37′14″ for a distance of 347.02 feet to the end of curve; thence North 89°58′13″ East 2230.64 feet to east line of Section 36, Township 42 South, Range 29 East; thence North 89°58′13″ East 2563.80 feet; thence North 89°55′43″ East 1170.63 feet; thence North 89°57′23″ East 3029.37 feet; thence North 89°54′53″ East 3900.00 feet; thence North 89°56′53″ East 4114.17 feet; thence North 89°55′53″ East 2612.89 feet; thence North 89°54′08″ East 6272.94 feet; thence North 89°52′53″ East 3411.00 feet; thence South 89°45′26″ East 2789.00 feet; thence South 89°47′46″ East 700.00 feet; thence South 89°45′26″ East 1300.00 feet; thence South 89°53′26″ East 95.20 feet to the east line of Section 36, Township 42 South, Range 30 East, at a point 5259.75 feet south of the northeast corner of said Section 36; thence continue South 89°53′26″ East 3340.50 feet; thence South 89°56′11″ East 4664.30 feet; thence South 89°57′11″ East 1500.00 feet; thence South 89°59′31″ East 2000.00 feet; thence South 89°57′11″ East 1064.05 feet; thence South 89°58′11″ East 2493.95 feet; thence North 89°53′49″ East 4142.00 feet; thence North 89°55′09″ East 2234.94 feet to the east line of Section 34, Township 42 South, Range 31 East, at a point 5229.50 feet South of the northeast corner of said Section 34; thence continue North 89°55′09″ East 5.38 feet; thence South 89°43′31″ East 3859.68 feet; thence South 89°41′51″ East 1390.84 feet to the west line of Section 36, Township 42 South, Range 31 East, at a point 5251.30 feet south of the northwest corner of said Section 36; thence continue South 89°41′51″ East 5083.59 feet to beginning of curve concaved to the southwest having a radius of 1196.28 feet and a central angle of 18°05′19″; thence southeasterly along said curve a distance of 377.67 feet to its intersection with the south line of Section 36, Township 42 South, Range 31 East on the county line between Glades and Hendry Counties.

Such deletion from Glades County and addition to Hendry County shall not affect the computation of taxes on or from gasoline made pursuant to law.

History.—s. 1, ch. 9360, 1923; s. 1, ch. 10090, 1925; CGL 72, 73; s. 1, ch. 18568, 1937; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 2, ch. 63-200; ss. 1, 2, ch. 63-391.

¹Note.—Section 1, ch. 63-391, enlarged the boundaries of Hendry County to include the territory listed in the second paragraph of s. 7.26. Section 2, ch. 63-391, which was compiled as the third paragraph of s. 7.26, provides that the deletion of territory from Glades County and addition to Hendry County “shall not affect the computation of taxes on or from gasoline made pursuant to law.” Chapter 63-391 did not amend s. 7.22 pertaining to Glades County to revise the property description for that county.

F.S. 7.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.26

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.26

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.26.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.26

Total Results: 20

Auerbach v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-20

Citation: 273 So. 3d 134

Snippet: DCA Dec. 7 26, 2018), issued after oral argument was held in this

Onewest Bank v. Palmero

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18

Snippet: claim. Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 7:26 (2017-2018 ed.) (footnotes omitted); see also Cong

Onewest Bank v. Palmero

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18

Snippet: claim. Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 7:26 (2017-2018 ed.) (footnotes omitted); see also Cong

& SC16-183 William A. Gregory v. State of Florida and William A. Gregory v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-31

Citation: 224 So. 3d 719

Snippet: brother called and left a message for Gregory at 7:26 a.m., stating, “You better run.” Gregory placed

Wilkerson v. Buras

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-08-12

Citation: 152 So. 3d 969, 2013 La.App. 1 Cir. 1328, 2014 WL 3928804, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1945

Snippet: Satterthwaite v. Byais, 05-0010 (La.App. 1st Cir.7/26/06), 943 So.2d 390, 393. This waiver exception has

Campbell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-16

Citation: 143 So. 3d 992, 2014 WL 3511138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10901

Snippet: trial court on 7/12/13, and denied on 7/26/13. (10) Appeal of the 7/26/13 denial of his motion to correct

Westbrooks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-06-13

Citation: 145 So. 3d 874, 2014 WL 2619430, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9103

Snippet: records also showed that Grier called Toombs around 7:26 p.m. and that Toombs called Grier at 7:41. These

Gregory v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-06-27

Citation: 118 So. 3d 770, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 471, 2013 WL 3214455, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1308

Snippet: brother called and left a message for Gregory at 7:26 a.m., stating, “You better run.” Gregory placed

Kasischke v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-07-10

Citation: 991 So. 2d 803, 2008 WL 2678449

Snippet: support its labored reading of section 948.03(5)(a)(7).[26]Cf., e.g., White v. State, 714 So.2d 440, 443 n

Winkler v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-25

Citation: 831 So. 2d 63, 2002 WL 717819

Snippet: 30(II) 30 07/26/1990 08/16/1990 30(I)

In Re Protest Election Returns and Absentee Ballots 4, 1997 Election for City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-11

Citation: 707 So. 2d 1170, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2408

Snippet: 82. [4] Appellant's Appendix Vol. XIII, pages 7, 26. [5] Appellant's Supplemental Appendix, Master

Rafferman v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-30

Citation: 659 So. 2d 1271, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9125, 1995 WL 509282

Snippet: Suicide of Patient or Former Patient, 19 A.L.R.4th 7, 26-29, 39-41, 49-51 (1983). Since “the ship’s captain

Holland v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-03-24

Citation: 636 So. 2d 1289, 1994 WL 91962

Snippet: Winters called for backup at 7:25 p.m., then called at 7:26 p.m. and said he had been shot. When officers reached

Morris v. NN Investors Life Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-12-12

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1306, 1989 WL 149633

Snippet: like, see Fla.Bar Code Prof.Resp., EC 7-22, 7-25 to 7-26, 7-35 to 7-39, which were contained in the previous

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1989-10-06

Snippet: 105, 106. 5 26 U.S.C. § 79. 6 26 U.S.C. § 120. 7 26 U.S.C. § 129. 8 See, Yates, Social Security Tax

Moviematic Industries Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-08-09

Citation: 349 So. 2d 667, 8 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20035, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536

Snippet: provided. See Anderson, R.M., American Law of Zoning § 7.26 (2d ed 1968). It is clear that the county commission

Moviematic Ind. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-08-09

Citation: 349 So. 2d 667

Snippet: provided. See Anderson, R.M., American Law of Zoning § 7.26 (2d ed 1968). It is clear that the county commission

Byrd v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-02-21

Citation: 297 So. 2d 22

Snippet: So. 279 (1903). [6] 97 So.2d 241 (Fla. 1957). [7] 26 Fla. 11, 7 So. 593 (1890). [8] 254 So.2d 40 (Fla

Youngblood v. Citrus Assoc. of NY Cotton Exch., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-04-17

Citation: 276 So. 2d 505

Snippet: interpretation of Florida law, see Bayitch, supra note 7, 26 U.Miami L.Rev. at 18. [9] See Florida Statute §

Gordon v. Phoenix Insurance Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-12-31

Citation: 242 So. 2d 485, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5373

Snippet: v. Watson (La. App. 1966), 188 So.2d 178, 179. [7] 26 A.L.R.3d 891, 892, § 3. [8] Gerardi v. Carlisle