Florida Statute 17.43 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.43

17.43 Federal Law Enforcement Trust Fund.—

(1) The Federal Law Enforcement Trust Fund is created within the Department of Financial Services. The department may deposit into the trust fund receipts and revenues received as a result of federal criminal, administrative, or civil forfeiture proceedings and receipts and revenues received from federal asset-sharing programs. The trust fund is exempt from the service charges imposed by s. 215.20.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.301 and pursuant to s. 216.351, any balance in the trust fund at the end of any fiscal year shall remain in the trust fund at the end of the year and shall be available for carrying out the purposes of the trust fund.

History.—s. 1, ch. 98-278; s. 2, ch. 99-84; s. 1, ch. 2001-65; s. 46, ch. 2003-261; s. 5, ch. 2004-234; s. 2, ch. 2007-14.

F.S. 17.43 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.43 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.43

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.43

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.43.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.43

Total Results: 12

JOSEREN DESHUNE DELANCY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 256 So. 3d 940

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOSEREN DESHUNE DELANCY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-43 [September 20, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman

EARL T. SHANNON, ETC. v. H & R HYDRO-PULL, INC., d/b/a H & R POWER SYSTEMS, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-25

Citation: 230 So. 3d 1251

Snippet: Hydro-Pull, Inc. is entitled to recover a total of $17,043.54 in principal jointly from Earl Shannon, individually

Holzhauer-Mosher v. Ford Motor Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-21

Citation: 772 So. 2d 7, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9252, 2000 WL 1508587

Snippet: Isuzu Rodeo and was given a trade-in allowance of $17,043. At the time of the trade-in, Holzhauer-Mosher

MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-07

Citation: 673 So. 2d 100, 1996 WL 225715

Snippet: actionable under this subchapter. Tex.Bus. & Com.Code § 17.43 (emphasis added). Justice Gonzales, in his concurring

Williams v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-04-11

Citation: 466 So. 2d 1246, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 936

Snippet: 420 U.S. 770, 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1293 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975); State v. Baker, 456 So.2d 419

Reynolds v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-11-28

Citation: 460 So. 2d 447, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2480, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16388

Snippet: 420 U.S. 770, 785 n. 17 [95 S.Ct. 1284, 1293 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616] (1975) (citations omitted). Blockburger

State v. Baker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-12

Citation: 456 So. 2d 419

Snippet: 420 U.S. 770, 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1293 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975) (citations omitted). Blockburger

Baker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-12-08

Citation: 425 So. 2d 36

Snippet: 420 U.S. 770, 785, n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1294, n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).[6] (emphasis added) [6] In

State v. Carpenter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-29

Citation: 417 So. 2d 986

Snippet: 420 U.S. 770, 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284, 1293 n. 17, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975). In Albernaz v. United States

Piowaty v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1948-02-13

Citation: 34 So. 2d 94, 160 Fla. 136, 1 A.L.R. 2d 705, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 626

Snippet: Amount Paid to — Advances Payments Balance 3-17-43 $1225.00 $1225.00 4-1-43

Craig v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1928-02-25

Citation: 116 So. 272, 95 Fla. 374

Snippet: several discrepancies thus resulting were "$17.65;" "$17.43;" "$3.43;" "$1.40;" * * *, etc., and that the aggregate

Realty Securities Corporation v. Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-01-18

Citation: 111 So. 532, 93 Fla. 46

Snippet: Howard, 123 Cal. 1, 55 P. 713, 69 Am. St. Rep. 17, 43 L. R. A. 199: "Land is one of the very highest