Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17
Snippet: ” Id. at 400 (citing Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20, 28-29 (1992); Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-13
Snippet: fundamental error. See Smith v. State, 320 So. 3d 20, 28 (Fla. 2021) (“In capital cases, a fundamental
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-29
Snippet: postconviction motion. Nelson v. State, 43 So. 3d 20, 28 (Fla. 2010); see also Freeman v. State, 761 So
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-15
Citation: 257 So. 3d 571
Snippet: two others. Appellant was intoxicated and driving 20-28 miles per hour over the speed limit at the time
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-16
Citation: 257 So. 3d 1096
Snippet: performance was deficient. See Nelson v. State, 43 So. 3d 20, 28 (Fla. 2010) (“[T]he defendant carries the burden
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-18
Citation: 244 So. 3d 370
Snippet: & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Easton, 894 So. 2d 20, 28 (Fla. 2004) (finding the cause of action created
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-26
Citation: 197 So. 3d 569, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2866, 2016 WL 746540
Snippet: motion” (citing Nelson v. State, 43 So.3d 20, 28 (Fla.2010))); see Correll v. State,
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-31
Citation: 136 So. 3d 680, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1194, 2014 WL 340672
Snippet: this issue de novo. See Nelson v. State, 43 So.3d 20, 28 (Fla.2010) (stating that appellate court reviews
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-27
Citation: 122 So. 3d 916, 2013 WL 5382147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15335
Snippet: Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 28, 111 S.Ct. 1647, 114 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991)). But the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-24
Citation: 112 So. 3d 644, 2013 WL 1748537, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6555
Snippet: non-privilege objections as to Items 10, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 28, and 33. The court deferred ruling as to the non-privilege
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-07
Citation: 40 So. 3d 804, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9884, 2010 WL 2671809
Snippet: rights"); State v. Tuttle, 2002 SD 94, ¶ 14, 650 N.W.2d 20, 28; State v. Holloway, 2000 ME 172, ¶ 12, 760 A.2d
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-17
Citation: 39 So. 3d 1216, 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20172, 2010 A.M.C. 2211, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 341, 71 ERC (BNA) 1005, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 944, 2010 WL 2400384
Snippet: Unif. & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Easton, 894 So.2d 20, 28 (Fla.2004) (holding that section 376(313(3) creates
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-10-01
Citation: 861 So. 2d 59, 2003 WL 22240322
Snippet: Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 28, 111 S.Ct. 1647, 114 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991)); see also
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-03-27
Snippet: Stat. 4 Section 215.444(2), Fla. Stat. 5 See, s. 20.28, Fla. Stat. 6 Section 20.03(11), Fla. Stat. 7 679
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1997-05-27
Snippet: powers as may be conferred upon it by law"; and s. 20.28, Fla. Stat., stating that the SBA, continued by
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-01-16
Citation: 687 So. 2d 860, 1997 WL 23144
Snippet: U.S. 211, 219, 94 S.Ct. 2253, 2260, 41 L.Ed.2d 20, 28-29 (1974). "The prohibition of the hearsay rule
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-11-10
Citation: 608 So. 2d 899, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11545, 1992 WL 324880
Snippet: U.S. 211, 219, 94 S.Ct. 2253, 2260, 41 L.Ed.2d 20, 28-29 (1974). “The prohibition of the hearsay rule
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-06-18
Citation: 563 So. 2d 97, 1990 WL 43141
Snippet: Raymond v. Chicago Union Traction Co., 207 U.S. 20, 28 S.Ct. 7, 52 L.Ed. 78 (1907); Arundel Corp. v. Sproul
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-20
Citation: 471 So. 2d 617, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1534
Snippet: acquires any rights under it. 38 Am.Jur.2d Guaranty § 20; 28 Fla.Jur.2d Guaranty & Suretyship § 17. Generally
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-04-17
Snippet: the life of this subsection 9(c).' See also, s 20.28, F.S., providing that the State Board of Administration