Florida Statute 28.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.32

28.32 Destruction of certain instruments.—After the expiration of 20 years from the date of the execution of any bond or other instrument held by the clerk of the circuit court or a sheriff of any of the several counties of the state, which said instrument was executed to secure the performance or nonperformance of any act or matter and no proceeding of any type is pending involving said instrument any of the several clerks of the circuit courts or sheriffs of the state are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to cancel said instruments and to destroy the same upon making appropriate notation of the destruction and disposition thereof upon any remaining records pertaining thereto.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25502, 1949.

F.S. 28.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.32

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.32

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.32.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 28.32

Total Results: 20

Mishelle Addys Perdomo Vindel v. Scott Aron Stewart

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-07T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: .; $40,978.09 in account [xx91] . . .; and $1,028.32 in xx83.” It thus found that a total of $107,970.40

SAVE CALUSA INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-01-31T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: court.” City of Fort Myers v. Splitt, 988 So. 2d 28, 32–33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

SAVE CALUSA INC. v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: court.” City of Fort Myers v. Splitt, 988 So. 2d 28, 32–33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

OBED COLON v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-03-09T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: also Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wolfson, 299 So. 3d 28, 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (explaining that “[b]ecause

Stufft v. Stufft

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-02-18T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: liability. See Guobaitis v. Sherrer, 18 So. 3d 28, 32–33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that the trial court

The Lake Hamilton Lakeshore Owners Association, Inc. v. Neidlinger

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 182 So. 3d 738, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19433

Snippet: v. Stanton Rowing Found., Inc., 912 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Consequently, the airboat

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Detzner

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-12-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 179 So. 3d 258, 2015 WL 7753054

Snippet: .28 .38 .20 .43 Remedial Plan .22 .26 .13 .23 .28 .32 .20 .43 I would conclude that the House and Senate

Alachua County School Board v. OFFICE OF the STATE, Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Financial Services, Division of Worker's Compensation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-03-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 138 So. 3d 480, 2014 WL 1257131, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4495

Snippet: to do so.’” Fuller v. Dep’t of Educ., 927 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (quoting City of St. Petersburg

Cole v. Cole

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 369, 2012 WL 3101614, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12357

Snippet: unambiguous. Schmachtenberg v. Schmachtenberg, 34 So.3d 28, 32-33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The MMSA simply did not

King v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-02-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 89 So. 3d 209, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103, 2012 WL 399863, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 302

Snippet: crime.” Shields v. State, 357 Ark. 283, 166 S.W.3d 28, 32 (2004). Furthermore, questions asked during cross-examination

Wright-Simpson v. Department of Corrections

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-12-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1122, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20051, 2004 WL 3000876

Snippet: 20); Chapter 33-208.003(13), (21), (22), (24), (28), (32), F.A.C., and the Rules of the Department of Management

Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved FamiLy Law Forms—Stepparent Adoption Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-03-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 870 So. 2d 791, 2004 WL 583720

Snippet: See ch.2003-58, §§ 1, 10-12, 14-19, 22-24, 26, 28, 32, 39, Laws of Fla. Pursuant to the procedures approved

Harvey v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-06-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 848 So. 2d 1060

Snippet: So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28, 32-33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We have jurisdiction. See

Brannon v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-06-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 850 So. 2d 452

Snippet: So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28, 32-33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We combined these two questions

Ravenscroft v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-01-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 838 So. 2d 589, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 478, 2003 WL 151223

Snippet: preserved for appeal. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that “no unpreserved

Hayden v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 833 So. 2d 275

Snippet: district explained in Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 797 So.2d 585 (

Sepe v. City of Safety Harbor

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-06-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 761 So. 2d 1182

Snippet: Schmidt v. Waterford Winery, Ltd., 177 Cal. App.2d 28, 32, 1 Cal.Rptr. 874 (1960) (holding wine pooling contract

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1991-04-16T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: nonperformance of any act or matter is provided for in s. 28.32, F.S. Nothing in Ch. 28, F.S., authorizes the clerk

Davis v. Bonded Transp., Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-01-09T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 573 So. 2d 373

Snippet: ); Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums, 532 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Instead, in appropriate circumstances

Lerman v. Broward Cty. Bd. of Com'rs

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-12-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 555 So. 2d 419

Snippet: ); Carson v. Gaineswood Condominiums, 532 So.2d 28, 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Rather, the test is whether