Florida Statute 35.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.01

35.01 District courts of appeal; districts.—Six district courts of appeal are created, and the state is divided into six appellate districts of contiguous circuits.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; s. 1, ch. 79-413; s. 4, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 35.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.01

Total Results: 14

United States v. Stanley Street

472 F.3d 1298, 2006 WL 3734533

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 2040662

Cited 110 times | Published

turning it on, Agent Fitzgerald violated O.C.G.A. § 35-1-5, a statute prohibiting actions that interfere

Robert H. Speer, Jr. v. Zell Miller, as Governor of Georgia, and Michael Bowers, as Attorney General of Georgia

15 F.3d 1007, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4074, 1994 WL 41303

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 2033628

Cited 20 times | Published

permanent injunction against the enforcement of O.C.G.A § 35-1-T9. 1 Speer challenged the statute entitled

Hermanson v. State

604 So. 2d 775, 1992 WL 148245

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1992 | Docket: 1686460

Cited 19 times | Published

Wyoming: Wyo. Stat. § 14-3-202(vii) (1991), id. § 35-1-201 (1988). [2] We distinguish this case from

Turner Const. Co. v. Advanced Roofing, Inc.

904 So. 2d 466, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6483, 2005 WL 1027077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2005 | Docket: 1365352

Cited 6 times | Published

coordinate scheduling with the Program manager. Section 35.1 of the Construction Management Agreement provides

Farzad v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

443 So. 2d 373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1983 | Docket: 1459050

Cited 6 times | Published

conviction thereof shall be punished as provided by Section 35.1. (emphasis supplied). The hearing officer felt

Florida Women's Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Smith

536 F. Supp. 1048, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13148

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1982 | Docket: 1780862

Cited 4 times | Published

and has immediate hospital backup ..." Ind.Code § 35-1-58.5-2(a)(1) (1975). The lower court emphasized

Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Cannon

80 F.3d 1525, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2048, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8663, 1996 WL 156862

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 19, 1996 | Docket: 419695

Cited 3 times | Published

otherwise be shielded from liability by Ga.Code Ann. § 35-1-7 (1993)? Our statement of the questions is

Ryan Maglana v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2025 | Docket: 68274089

Published

Argued: Feb 27, 2025

omit- ted)); RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF TORTS § 35(1)(d) (AM. L. INST. 1934) (deﬁning false

In Re: Judicial Circuit Assessment

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2023 | Docket: 68107501

Published

7 Art. V, §§ 1, 4(a), Fla. Const. (1968). 8 § 35.01, Fla. Stat. (2023). 9 Art V, § 4(b), Fla. Const

The Georgia Electronic Life Safety & System Association, Inc. v. The City of Sandy Springs, Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 2020 | Docket: 17360765

Published

an unauthorized intrusion. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 35-1-9,1 an operator must first call the site or alarm

United States v. Christopher Tobin

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 2012 | Docket: 2904943

Published

U.S.C. § 35 1. Exclusion

Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

22 F.3d 270

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 64016944

Published

of authority that the FERC promulgated 18 C.F.R. § 35.1 (1993), which permits the use of certificates of

P & T Electric Co. v. Spadea

227 So. 2d 234, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1969 | Docket: 64511746

Published

17(a) (4) of the Bankruptcy Act (U.S.Code, Section 35) ,1 The problem with this contention is that it

City of Miami v. Schonfeld

132 So. 2d 767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1961 | Docket: 60198315

Published

sought to collect the tax under the authority of Section 35-1 of The Code of the City of Miami, Florida, 1957