Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 35.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 35.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 35.01

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 35.01
35.01 District courts of appeal; districts.Six district courts of appeal are created, and the state is divided into six appellate districts of contiguous circuits.
History.s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; s. 1, ch. 79-413; s. 4, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.01

Total Results: 20

In Re: Certification of Need for Additional Judges

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-12

Snippet: District also noted that despite 16. See §§ 35.01, .044, Fla. Stat. (2023).

Bookertee Hartfield v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Snippet: county-operated crime laboratory enumerated in s. 943.35(1) are used in connection with the investigation

In Re: Judicial Circuit Assessment

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-21

Snippet: 7 Art. V, §§ 1, 4(a), Fla. Const. (1968). 8 § 35.01, Fla. Stat. (2023). 9 Art V, § 4(b), Fla. Const

DIRTY DUCK 16004, LLC, DIRTY DUCK 16008, LLC v. TOWN OF REDINGTON BEACH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-08

Snippet: court's alleged misinterpretation of section 163.035.1 See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(B) (providing for

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc. v. REGIS BONTOUX

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-03

Snippet: exceed $5000 (a total maximum amount of $35,0001) for services rendered by counsel for 1 There

Edward A. Crapo, in his capacity as Alachua County Property Appraiser v. Academy for Five Element Acupuncture, Inc., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-08

Snippet: the Florida Bar for at least five years. § 194.035(1), Fla. Stat. The VAB has specific authority

Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-18

Citation: 268 So. 3d 668

Snippet: campaign for election to judicial office." Section 105.035(1), Florida Statutes (2018), also explains that "[a]

Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Snippet: for election to judicial office.” Section 105.035(1), Florida Statutes (2018), also explains that “[a]

Kenneth J. Detzner, etc. v. League of Women Voters of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-15

Citation: 256 So. 3d 803

Snippet: arts, to serve all of the State of Florida." § 1002.35(1), Fla. Stat. (2018) (emphasis added). 4.

Matheson v. Miami-Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-10

Citation: 258 So. 3d 516

Snippet: the board deems to be the highest and best.” § 125.35(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017).

Sciandra v. Pennymac Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-19

Citation: 227 So. 3d 164, 2017 WL 2199096

Snippet: judgment of $657,262.35 by $11,309 to $645,953.35. 1 We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure

Rorrer F/K/A Orban v. Orban

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-29

Citation: 215 So. 3d 148, 2017 WL 1177588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4189

Snippet: adding Ms. Orban’s fees and costs ($230,802.35) 1 to Mr, Orban’s fees and costs ($284,470

Thurston v. State, Florida Elections Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-15

Citation: 210 So. 3d 684, 2017 WL 625791, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2059

Snippet: decision shall be provided to the candidate.” § 106.35(1) (footnote omitted). The statute further provides

McLendon v. Nikolits

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-25

Citation: 211 So. 3d 92, 2017 WL 362555, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 765

Snippet: with opinion. MAY, J., concurs. . Section 194.035(1), Florida Statutes (2013) provides that “the board

Housing Opportunities Project for Excellence, Inc. v. Spv Realty, Lc

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-21

Citation: 212 So. 3d 419, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18680

Snippet: their civil action seeking relief under section 760.35(1) of the FFHA. That section does not contain an exhaustion

& SC13-389 & SC13-390 The Florida Bar v. Charles Jay Kane, The Florida Bar v. Harley Nathan Kane & The Florida Bar v. Darin James Lentner

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-06

Citation: 202 So. 3d 11

Snippet: fully comply with Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 35.1(h). Additionally, respondent Charles Kane and

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-07

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-12

Citation: 192 So. 3d 1190, 2016 WL 2757011

Snippet: 28.14 BOATING UNDER THE INFLUENCE § 327.35(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Boating

Latham v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-10

Citation: 185 So. 3d 686, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 2016 WL 540650

Snippet: [a] violation of s. 316.193, s. 316.027(1), s. 327.35(1), s. 782.071(1)(b), or s. 860.13(l)(a) which results

& SC13-2480 The Florida Bar v. Jeffrey Alan Norkin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-10-08

Citation: 183 So. 3d 1018

Snippet: Norkin failed to comply with the requirements of rule 35.1(h). Rule 3-5.1(h) states: (h) Notice to Clients

Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Anderson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-19

Citation: 153 So. 3d 412, 2014 WL 7191042

Snippet: total sum of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND AND ONE DOLLARS ($35,001.00), exclusive of attorneys’ fees and costs, in