ERVIN, v. RICHARDSON,
70 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1954)
. . . Walker filed their complaint in the Circuit Court in which they prayed for an interpretation of Section 100.081 . . . filed and on final hearing the chancellor entered a declaratory decree holding the proviso to Section 100.081 . . . The point for determination challenges the validity of the chancellor’s order invalidating Section 100.081 . . . cotmty officers, and shall hold office for four years, * *
An inspection of the proviso to Section 100.081 . . . Appellees contend that Section 100.081 unnecessarily restricts each elector to .a yoice in selecting . . .
