Florida Statute 100.102 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 100
GENERAL, PRIMARY, SPECIAL, BOND, AND REFERENDUM ELECTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 100.102

100.102 Cost of special elections and special primary elections to be incurred by the state.—Whenever any special election or special primary election is held as required in s. 100.101, each county incurring expenses resulting from such special election or special primary election shall be reimbursed by the state. Reimbursement shall be based upon actual expenses as filed by the supervisor of elections with the county governing body. The Department of State shall verify the expenses of each special election and each special primary election and authorize payment for reimbursement to each county affected.

History.—s. 2, ch. 74-120; s. 12, ch. 77-175.

F.S. 100.102 on Google Scholar

F.S. 100.102 on Casetext

Amendments to 100.102

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 100.102

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 100.102.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 100.102

Total Results: 20

ALEX FINCH D/B/A FINCH LAW FIRM, AND FROMANG AND FINCH, P.A. v. AUTO CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, BRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C., LINDA MICHELLE BERNS MASSEY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-05-10

Snippet: Coca–Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 1955)). Appellants argue that venue

CARLOS H. DOBAL v. VILLAS AT SOUTH BEACH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-02

Snippet: exception to immunity. Berg v. Wagner, 935 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (allegations “that the directors

PETER A. COLOMBO v. ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ & SCHNEID, P.L.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-05-04

Snippet: Stratton v. Port St. Lucie MGT, LLC, 149 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“The statute is designed

IN RE: NAME CHANGE OF SHEIKERA WILLIAMS vs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-23

Snippet: 1008; Name Change of Wages v. State, 160 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“As the petition was facially

KRATOS INVESTMENTS LLC v. ABS HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-09

Snippet: ABS Healthcare Servs., LLC, 319 So. 3d 97, 99-100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). The trial court duly entered

WPB RESIDENTS FOR INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT, INC. v. SHARON "SHANON" MATERIO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-30

Snippet: Dep’t of Children & Families, 866 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (quoting Greenberg v. Cardiology

Skydive Space Center, Inc. v. Pohjolainen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-12

Citation: 275 So. 3d 825

Snippet: " Roussell v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 263 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (citing Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen

Skydive Space Center, Inc. v. Pohjolainen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-12

Citation: 275 So. 3d 825

Snippet: " Roussell v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 263 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (citing Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen

Anthony Paul Peoples, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-09

Citation: 251 So. 3d 291

Snippet: 2d 917, 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). 889 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (emphasis added). In

ICMfg & Associates, Inc. v. The Bare Board Group, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-17

Citation: 238 So. 3d 326

Snippet: conduct]." Rucker v. Garlock, Inc., 672 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Talucci, 960 So.

Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-15

Citation: 205 So. 3d 768, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881

Snippet: Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955) (stating that a defendant challenging

Gregor Woodward v. Orator E. Woodward, individually, and as Trustee of the Mary T. Woodward Trust, etc., Lorence Woodward, Marcus Woodward, Serena Woodward and Maureen Woodward

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-04

Citation: 192 So. 3d 528, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881

Snippet: (2006); Berg v. Wagner, 935 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). The four-year statute

D. J. E., A Child v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-10-20

Citation: 178 So. 3d 78

Snippet: appears.” B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). The statute further provides

Hall v. Animals.com, L.L.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-08-07

Citation: 171 So. 3d 216, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11798, 2015 WL 4660127

Snippet: Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955). “As a part of this burden, the party

Perez-Tejon v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-01

Citation: 147 So. 3d 1094, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15287, 2014 WL 4852882

Snippet: quoted by B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102-03 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). A showing that the defendant’s

Hernandez v. Gonzalez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-10-30

Citation: 124 So. 3d 988, 2013 WL 5807814, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17203

Snippet: ’” (quoting Rucker v. Garlock, Inc., 672 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996))). Where there is a dispute

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-06-26

Citation: 117 So. 3d 818, 2013 WL 3197137, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066

Snippet: 4th DCA 2008) (quoting B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). The suspect must be given

Mann v. Yeatts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-05

Citation: 111 So. 3d 934, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5597, 2013 WL 1348611

Snippet: Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955). “When a trial court is presented with

E.F. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-03-20

Citation: 110 So. 3d 101, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4416, 2013 WL 1136336

Snippet: juvenile case is de novo. B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). This is because “the motion

M.R. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-14

Citation: 101 So. 3d 389, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605, 2012 WL 5500505

Snippet: the conduct involved.” B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102-03 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting E.C., 724 So.2d