Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-05-10T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Coca–Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 1955)). Appellants argue that venue
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-08-02T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: exception to immunity. Berg v. Wagner, 935 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (allegations “that the directors
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-05-04T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Stratton v. Port St. Lucie MGT, LLC, 149 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“The statute is designed
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-03-23T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: 1008; Name Change of Wages v. State, 160 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“As the petition was facially
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-03-08T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: ABS Healthcare Servs., LLC, 319 So. 3d 97, 99-100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). The trial court duly entered
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-10-30T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: . Dep’t of Children & Families, 866 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (quoting Greenberg v. Cardiology
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 275 So. 3d 825
Snippet: quot; Roussell v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 263 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (citing Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 275 So. 3d 825
Snippet: quot; Roussell v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 263 So. 3d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (citing Volusia Cty. v. Aberdeen
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-07-09T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 251 So. 3d 291
Snippet: .2d 917, 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). 889 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (emphasis added). In
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-03-17T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: conduct]." Rucker v. Garlock, Inc., 672 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); see also Talucci, 960 So.
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-07-15T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 205 So. 3d 768, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10881
Snippet: Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955) (stating that a defendant challenging
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-05-04T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 192 So. 3d 528, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881
Snippet: . (2006); Berg v. Wagner, 935 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). The four-year statute
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-10-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 178 So. 3d 78
Snippet: appears.” B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). The statute further provides
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-08-07T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 171 So. 3d 216, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11798, 2015 WL 4660127
Snippet: Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955). “As a part of this burden, the party
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-01T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 147 So. 3d 1094, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15287, 2014 WL 4852882
Snippet: quoted by B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102-03 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). A showing that the defendant
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-30T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 124 So. 3d 988, 2013 WL 5807814, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17203
Snippet: ’” (quoting Rucker v. Garlock, Inc., 672 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996))). Where there is a dispute
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-06-26T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 117 So. 3d 818, 2013 WL 3197137, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066
Snippet: 4th DCA 2008) (quoting B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). The suspect must be given
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-05T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 111 So. 3d 934, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5597, 2013 WL 1348611
Snippet: Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955). “When a trial court is presented with
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-03-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 110 So. 3d 101, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4416, 2013 WL 1136336
Snippet: juvenile case is de novo. B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). This is because “the motion
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-14T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 101 So. 3d 389, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19605, 2012 WL 5500505
Snippet: the conduct involved.” B.J. v. State, 951 So.2d 100, 102-03 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting E.C., 724 So.2d