Florida Statute 112.28 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 112.28

112.28 Status of employees of this state.—

(1) Employees of a sending agency participating in an exchange of personnel as authorized in s. 112.27 may be considered during such participation to be on detail to regular work assignments of the sending agency.

(2) Employees who are on detail shall be entitled to the same salary and benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled and shall remain employees of the sending agency for all other purposes except that the supervision of their duties during the period of detail may be governed by agreement between the sending agency and the receiving agency.

(3) Any employee who participates in an exchange under the terms of this section who suffers disability or death as a result of personal injury arising out of and in the course of an exchange, or sustained in performance of duties in connection therewith, shall be treated, for the purposes of the sending agency’s employee compensation program, as an employee, as defined in such act, who has sustained such injury in the performance of such duty, but shall not receive benefits under that act for any period for which he or she is entitled to and elects to receive similar benefits under the receiving agency’s employee compensation program.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-524; s. 696, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 112.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 112.28

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 112.28

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 112.28.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 112.28

Total Results: 2

Drexel v. City of Miami Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-02-24

Citation: 64 So. 2d 317, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1191

Snippet: added.] "`City of Richmond v. Dudley, 129 Ind. 112, 28 N.E. 312, 13 L.R.A. [587], 589, * * *.'" Blitch

Blitch v. City of Ocala

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-04-12

Citation: 195 So. 406, 142 Fla. 612, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1424

Snippet: so comply. City of Richmond v. Dudley, 129 Ind. 112, 28 N.E. 312, 13 L.R.A. 589, 28 Am. St. Rep. 180."