The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . OLC 222, 257, n. 36 (Oct. 16, 2000)). . . . Lomask, Aaron Burr: The Conspiracy and Years of Exile, 1805-1836, pp. 222-298 (1982). . . . Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) 222, 260 (2000) (Moss Memo); Memorandum from R. Dixon, Asst. Atty. . . .
. . . Jensen , 244 U.S. 205, 222, 37 S.Ct. 524, 61 L.Ed. 1086 (1917) (Holmes, J., dissenting), ever ready to . . . Thompson , 403 U.S. 217, 221-222, 91 S.Ct. 1940, 29 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971). . . .
. . . Hargis Industries, Inc. , 575 U.S. 138, 142, 135 S.Ct. 1293, 191 L.Ed.2d 222 (2015) ). . . .
. . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 265-275, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) ; Johnson v. . . . . ; App. 171, 217, 222, 419. . . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 278, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) (Kennedy, J., concurring . . .
. . . Locomotive Engineers , 482 U.S. 270, 277-284, 107 S.Ct. 2360, 96 L.Ed.2d 222 (1987) ; United States v . . .
. . . Offutt , 216 Va. 681, 684, 222 S.E.2d 522, 525 (1976). . . .
. . . L.J. 219, 222-223 (1967). . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 181, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). . . .
. . . See 449 U.S. at 222-223, 101 S.Ct. 471. . . .
. . . Slater , 528 U.S. 216, 222, 120 S.Ct. 722, 145 L.Ed.2d 650 (2000) (per curiam ) (internal quotation marks . . .
. . . Id. , at 141, 222. . . .
. . . Central Office Telephone, Inc. , 524 U.S. 214, 228, 118 S.Ct. 1956, 141 L.Ed.2d 222 (1998) (quoting Texas . . .
. . . Black , 503 U.S. 222, 227-228, 112 S.Ct. 1130, 117 L.Ed.2d 367 (1992). Post, at 1425 - 1426. Ibid. . . . Illinois , 446 U.S. 222, 100 S.Ct. 1585, 64 L.Ed.2d 169 (1980) (per curiam )). . . .
. . . Walton , 535 U.S. 212, 222, 122 S.Ct. 1265, 152 L.Ed.2d 330 (2002). . . .
. . . . § 1-303(c) ; Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 219, Comment a ; § 222(2). . . .
. . . Ashcroft , 342 F.3d 207, 222 (CA3 2003) (same); Mu-Xing Wang v. . . .
. . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) ). . . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990), is not dispositive of the Fourth . . .
. . . No. 19-222 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). . . .
. . . Credit Union , 222 F. Supp. 3d 1, 6 (D.D.C. 2016). . . . Chambers , 222 F. Supp. 3d at 6. . . . To support its interpretation of the word "available," LGE cites to Chambers . 222 F. . . .
. . . care/general hospital Title VIII (Medicare) provider."), but were later able to enroll, see S2-AR at 222 . . .
. . . See In re Gbadebo , 431 B.R. 222, 227 n.6 (Bankr. N.D. . . .
. . . Cl. 212, 222, decision clarified , 68 Fed. Cl. 276 (2005), aff'd , 479 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007). . . .
. . . Alice , 573 U.S. at 222, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted). . . .
. . . Id. at 222-23, 133 S. Ct. at 1009. . . .
. . . Gorczyk, 273 F.3d 212, 222 (2d Cir. 2001) ; see also Corby v. . . . Fuller, 273 F.3d at 222. . . .
. . . trooper to a jury "in defiance" of "the concept and precedents of qualified immunity." 777 F.3d 221, 222 . . .
. . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 265, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) (recognizing that when a . . .
. . . Ceron-Sanchez , 222 F.3d 1169, 1172-73 (9th Cir. 2000), overruled by Fernandez-Ruiz v. . . .
. . . JA 222-23. JA 224. JA 224. JA 225. JA 135. JA 134. JA 135-36. JA 135, 137. . . .
. . . New Jersey, 222 F.3d 118, 122 (3d Cir. 2000) (considering prosecutorial misconduct consisting of coercing . . .
. . . Sheahan , 222 F.3d 309, 318 (7th Cir. 2000). That characterization may not be quite right. . . .
. . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 272, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) (citations omitted) (citing . . .
. . . Livorsi Marine, Inc. , 222 Ill. 2d 303, 312, 305 Ill.Dec. 533, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006). . . . Livorsi Marine , 222 Ill. 2d at 317, 305 Ill.Dec. 533, 856 N.E.2d 338 ; see also Yorkville , 238 Ill. . . .
. . . City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104, 110, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972) ; id. at 112, 92 S.Ct. 2294 . . .
. . . Moore , 968 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) ). . . .
. . . No. 144-222, 130 Stat. 852 (Sept. 28, 2016), by providing financial services to Al Rajhi Bank, a prominent . . .
. . . Id. at 222. . . . See id. at 222. . . . II, 318 F.R.D. at 222. We do not go so far. . . .
. . . (Trial Tr. at 194, 196 (Taylor); see P-222; P-223; P-225.) . . .
. . . Illinois Supreme Court Rule 273, which explains the effects of involuntary dismissals. 175 Ill.2d 176, 222 . . . See Leow , 222 Ill.Dec. 80, 676 N.E.2d at 1288. . . .
. . . Supp. 221, 222 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. 1993). . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962) (noting that "undue delay," "bad faith, . . .
. . . United States , 562 U.S. 888, 131 S.Ct. 222, 178 L.Ed.2d 134 (2010). . . .
. . . Apfel , 222 F.3d 496, 503 (8th Cir. 2000). We conclude that a remand is unnecessary here. . . .
. . . Corp. , 222 F.3d 218, 231 (6th Cir. 2000) (citing TRW-United Greenfield Div. v. . . . Corp. , 222 F.3d at 231 ; Coach & Equip Sales Corp. , 228 NLRB at 441. . . . Corp. , 222 F.3d at 230-31 ; In re Dillon Companies, Inc. , 340 NLRB at 1272. . . . Fabrications Corp. , 222 F.3d 218, 231 (6th Cir. 2000). . . . Fabrications Corp. , 222 F.3d at 231 ("[A] simple threat to diminish, however slightly, the quality of . . .
. . . Di Re , 332 U.S. 581, 595, 68 S.Ct. 222, 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948) ("We have had frequent occasion to point . . .
. . . Elstad , 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985). . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962) ; see also Klamath-Lake Pharm. . . .
. . . Supp. 3d 211, 222 (E.D. . . .
. . . Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. , 798 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir. 2015) ); Paske v. . . .
. . . United States , 550 U.S. 192, 222, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007) ("which of various possible . . .
. . . L. 114-222, § 2(b), 130 Stat. 852, 853 (2016). . . .
. . . See ECF No. 276-1 at 222-43. . . .
. . . App'x 220, 222-23 (3d Cir. 2009) (quoting Holifield v. . . .
. . . Osceola County , 222 F.3d 874, 881 (11th Cir. 2000) (quoting Munoz-Mendoza v. . . . an opportunity to provide evidence" that it satisfied the standing requirement at issue); Bischoff , 222 . . . Bischoff , 222 F.3d at 881 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). . . .
. . . J.A. 222. . . .
. . . Id. at 222. . . .
. . . Id . at 222, 126 S.Ct. 2546. . . .
. . . First Amendment Issues...222 VII. Sentence...223 VIII. Conclusion...225 I. . . .
. . . . ¶ 222.) . . . Nos. 222, 225.) . . .
. . . Alexander , 982 F.2d 222, 228 (7th Cir. 1992). Pac. Shores Props., LLC v. . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962), also involved a post-judgment motion. . . .
. . . Bureau of Prisons , 552 U.S. 214, 222, 128 S.Ct. 831, 169 L.Ed.2d 680 (2008) (noting that courts' construction . . .
. . . Knott , 128 S.W.3d 211, 222 (Tex. 2003). . . .
. . . Id. at 113, 222 (Page ID #435, 544). The handgun was black and stainless steel. . . .
. . . City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104, 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). . . .
. . . Nelson , 222 F.3d 545, 550 (9th Cir. 2000). . . . See Nelson , 222 F.3d at 551 ; Zavalza-Rodriguez , 379 F.3d at 1188 ("The scope of activity covered by . . .
. . . Carney , 222 W.Va. 152, 663 S.E.2d 606, 611 (2008) ). . . .
. . . United States , 445 U.S. 222, 226, 100 S.Ct. 1108, 63 L.Ed.2d 348 (1980), that authorizes fraud-only . . .
. . . United States , 222 F.2d 906, 911 (4th Cir. 1955) (noting that "corroboration is needed only to allay . . .
. . . Supp. 3d at 222. . . . Moritsugu , 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). . . .
. . . McCrory , 831 F.3d 204, 214, 222 (4th Cir. 2016) ). . . .
. . . Black , 503 U.S. 222, 228, 112 S. Ct. 1130, 1135, 117 L.Ed.2d 367 (1992). . . .
. . . Standard Oil Co. of Ca., 399 U.S. 222, 223, 90 S.Ct. 1989, 26 L.Ed.2d 534 (1970) (per curiam) (mandating . . .
. . . Holder, 597 F.3d 222, 226-27 (4th Cir. 2010) ("The exhaustion doctrine embodies a policy of respect for . . .
. . . Bank of Am. , 361 F.3d 217, 222 n.3 (3d Cir. 2004) ). Walker v. Mathis , 665 F. . . .
. . . See Sorenson Comms. , 897 F.3d at 222-23, 226 ; Wash. All. of Tech. Workers v. U.S. . . .
. . . Verdugo-Urquidez , 494 U.S. 259, 264, 110 S.Ct. 1056, 108 L.Ed.2d 222 (1990) (noting that "[t]he privilege . . .
. . . Hatcher , 560 F.3d 222, 224 (4th Cir. 2009), and find that the district court correctly denied Cortez's . . .
. . . Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). . . .
. . . Rockingham Poultry Marketing Coop., Inc. , 222 Va. 270, 279 S.E.2d 400, 404 (1981) ("When the General . . . City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104, 108-09, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). . . .
. . . See Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 222(3) (stating that "[u]nless otherwise agreed, a usage of trade . . .
. . . Coney , 2013 Ark. 222, 427 S.W.3d 682, 685 (2013). . . .
. . . Brightstar's warehouses met the "minimum standards of care" contained in the marine cargo policy, id. at 222 . . . that it was his job to ensure that Brightstar's warehouses met minimum standards, see O'Brien Dep. at 222 . . . Co., 284 A.D.2d 924, 925, 727 N.Y.S.2d 222 (4th Dep't 2001). . . .
. . . Ceron-Sanchez , 222 F.3d 1169, 1172 (9th Cir. 2000) ). . . .
. . . App. 3d 598, 610-611, 222 Cal. Rptr. 276.) . . .
. . . Moore, 968 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) ); see Leon, 468 U.S. at 923, 104 S.Ct. 3405. . . .
. . . Valley Forge Christian Coll. , 454 U.S. at 482-87, 102 S.Ct. 752 ; see also Schlesinger , 418 U.S. at 222 . . .
. . . Mayor & Council of City of Wilmington , 355 F.3d 215, 222 (3d Cir. 2004) (citing Celotex Corp. v. . . . Pelullo , 399 F.3d 197, 222 (3d Cir. 2005) ("It is well settled that an appellant's failure to identify . . .
. . . Davis , 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962) ; Starr , 592 F.3d at 321, and we see no . . .
. . . App'x 221, 222 (5th Cir. 2014) (per curiam) (finding defendant "connived or took other actions designed . . .
. . . Bustamonte, 412 U.S. at 222, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). . . .
. . . ."); 16 COUCH ON INSURANCE § 222:5 ("[O]n paying a loss, an insurer is subrogated in a corresponding . . .
. . . No. [60] ¶ 222. . . .
. . . Walton , 535 U.S. 212, 222, 122 S.Ct. 1265, 152 L.Ed.2d 330 (2002). . . . Barnhart , 535 U.S. at 222, 122 S.Ct. 1265 (weighing "the careful consideration the Agency has given . . . See Barnhart , 535 U.S. at 222, 122 S.Ct. 1265. . . .
. . . June 6 Order, the Oversight Board failed to substantiate its claim of attorney-client privilege as to 222 . . .
. . . Middleton, 779 F.3d 222, 225 (4th Cir. 2015) ; Speet v. . . . Middleton , 779 F.3d 222, 225 (4th Cir. 2015) ; Speet v. . . .
. . . UBS AG, 222 F. Supp. 3d 358, 369 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). . . . UBS AG, 222 F. . . .
. . . J.A. 222. The district court placed the burden of proof for the immunity issue on the Entities. . . . J.A. 222. . . .
. . . TheStreet.Com , 273 F.3d 222, 232 (2d Cir. 2001) ; and "the privacy interest of those who resist disclosure . . .