Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 316.1935
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§316.1935(1)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEPENALTY INCREAS TO F/T ON 7/1/04; SEE REC#4154M · 1st
§316.1935(1)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEFAIL TO OBEY LEO ORDER TO STOPF · 3rd
§316.1935(2)RESIST OFFICERRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9479F · 3rd
§316.1935(2)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEFLEE ELUDE LEO WITH LIGHTS SIREN ACTIVEF · 3rd
§316.1935(3)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEREMOVEDF · 2nd
§316.1935(3a)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEFLEE ELUDE HIGH SPEED OR DISR SAFETY PERS PROPF · 2nd
§316.1935(3b)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEFLEE ELUDE CAUSING INJURY OR DEATHF · 1st
§316.1935(4a)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEAGGRAVATED FLEEING W INJURY OR DAMAGEF · 2nd
§316.1935(4a)RESIST OFFICERRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 4097F · 2nd
§316.1935(4b)RESIST OFFICERRENUMBERED. SEE REC # 4098F · 2nd
§316.1935(4b)FLEE/ELUDE POLICEAGGRAVATED FLEEING W SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATHF · 1st
Civil Citations under F.S. 316.1935
Driver's license points · R = revocation · S = suspension§316.1935(1)Fail obey police officer/fleeR
§316.1935(2)Flee/elude officer in patrol vehicle (Revoked by court)R
§316.1935(3)(a)Flee/elude officer/disregard safety of others (Revoked by Court)R
§316.1935(3)(b)FLEE/ELUDE OFFICER- SBI or death (Revoked indefinite/minimum incarceration of 3 years)R
§316.1935(4)(a)Fleeing/elude officer after crash involving property damage or injuryR
§316.1935(4)(b)FLEE/ELUDE OFFICER- After Crash, SBI or death (REV indefinite/min incarceration of 3 yrs.)R
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
278
cases (
20 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case:
United States v. Harrison, 558 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Harrison, 558 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 17× “HULL, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of whether a prior state conviction for violating subsection 2 of Florida’s willful fleeing statute, Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2), is a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.”
United States v. Harris, 586 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 17× “He argues that his prior felony conviction under Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (3)(a) for willfully fleeing or eluding a police officer at high speed or with wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property should not qualify as a “crime of violence,” as defined by U.”
United States v. Michael Petite, 703 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 11× “The sole question the defendant has raised on appeal is whether his prior conviction for intentional vehicular flight from an authorized law enforcement patrol car in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2) is a violent felony for ACCA purposes.”
United States v. Dedrick D. Gandy, 710 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 9× “As relevant to this appeal, the district court also addressed Gandy’s 2001 conviction for fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2) 2 and held that it was bound by precedent in this Circuit to hold that this crime was not…”
In Re Stand. Jury Inst.-Crim. Cases, 765 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2000).
· cites it 18× “[10: A Revised Instruction for Eluding an Officer (Fleeing/Failure to Stop)] FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER F.S. 316.1935 Before you can find the defendant guilty of Fleeing or Attempting to Elude a Police Officer, the State *703 must prove the following three…”
Slack v. State, 30 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
· cites it 26× “While subsections (1) and (2) of section 316.1935 are punishable in the same fashion without regard to any enhancement statute, we have interpreted Sanders in a way that makes this immaterial.”
McCullough v. State, 230 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
· cites it 26× “§ 316.1935(3). Leaving the scene of a crash with death does not contain such an element and instead requires willfully leaving the scene of a crash with death.”
Dumais v. State, 40 So. 3d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
· cites it 22× “" § 316.1935(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). We affirm.”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report 2011-01, 73 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2011).
· cites it 11× “6 FLEEING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER § 316.1935(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fleeing to Elude a Law Enforcement Officer, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
· cites it 2× “21, § 4103 (1979); Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (Supp. 1984); III. Rev.”
Gorsuch v. State, 797 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
· cites it 12× “Section 316.1935 Florida Statutes (2000) provides: Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer; aggravated fleeing and eluding (1) It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he or she has been ordered to stop such vehicle by a duly…”
— 316.1935(1) — 55 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Inst.-Crim. Cases, 765 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2000).
“[10: A Revised Instruction for Eluding an Officer (Fleeing/Failure to Stop)] FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER F.S. 316.1935 Before you can find the defendant guilty of Fleeing or Attempting to Elude a Police Officer, the State *703 must prove the following three…”
Slack v. State, 30 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“While subsections (1) and (2) of section 316.1935 are punishable in the same fashion without regard to any enhancement statute, we have interpreted Sanders in a way that makes this immaterial.”
Gorsuch v. State, 797 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
“Section 316.1935 Florida Statutes (2000) provides: Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer; aggravated fleeing and eluding (1) It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he or she has been ordered to stop such vehicle by a duly…”
— 316.1935(2) — 70 cases
Dumais v. State, 40 So. 3d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
“" § 316.1935(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). We affirm.”
Slack v. State, 30 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
“While subsections (1) and (2) of section 316.1935 are punishable in the same fashion without regard to any enhancement statute, we have interpreted Sanders in a way that makes this immaterial.”
United States v. Harrison, 558 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2009).
“HULL, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of whether a prior state conviction for violating subsection 2 of Florida’s willful fleeing statute, Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2), is a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.”
— 316.1935(2)(a) — 1 case
— 316.1935(3) — 34 cases
Gorsuch v. State, 797 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
“Section 316.1935 Florida Statutes (2000) provides: Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer; aggravated fleeing and eluding (1) It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he or she has been ordered to stop such vehicle by a duly…”
In Re Stand. Jury Inst.-Crim. Cases, 765 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2000).
“[10: A Revised Instruction for Eluding an Officer (Fleeing/Failure to Stop)] FLEEING OR ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A POLICE OFFICER F.S. 316.1935 Before you can find the defendant guilty of Fleeing or Attempting to Elude a Police Officer, the State *703 must prove the following three…”
United States v. Harrison, 558 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2009).
“HULL, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question of whether a prior state conviction for violating subsection 2 of Florida’s willful fleeing statute, Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2), is a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.”
United States v. Dedrick D. Gandy, 710 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2013).
“As relevant to this appeal, the district court also addressed Gandy’s 2001 conviction for fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in violation of Fla. Stat. § 316.1935 (2) 2 and held that it was bound by precedent in this Circuit to hold that this crime was not…”
— 316.1935(3)(a) — 37 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report 2011-01, 73 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2011).
“6 FLEEING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER § 316.1935(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fleeing to Elude a Law Enforcement Officer, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
— 316.1935(3)(b) — 14 cases
McCullough v. State, 230 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
“§ 316.1935(3). Leaving the scene of a crash with death does not contain such an element and instead requires willfully leaving the scene of a crash with death.”
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report 2011-01, 73 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2011).
“6 FLEEING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER § 316.1935(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fleeing to Elude a Law Enforcement Officer, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
— 316.1935(4) — 8 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report 2011-01, 73 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2011).
“6 FLEEING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER § 316.1935(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fleeing to Elude a Law Enforcement Officer, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
— 316.1935(4)(a) — 8 cases
In Re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—Report 2011-01, 73 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2011).
“6 FLEEING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER § 316.1935(1), Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Fleeing to Elude a Law Enforcement Officer, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
— 316.1935(4)(b) — 7 cases
McCullough v. State, 230 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
“§ 316.1935(3). Leaving the scene of a crash with death does not contain such an element and instead requires willfully leaving the scene of a crash with death.”
— 316.1935(5) — 3 cases
— 316.1935(6) — 13 cases
— 316.1935(7) — 1 case
— 316.1935(8)(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.