Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 321.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 321.03 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 321.03

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 321
HIGHWAY PATROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 321.03
321.03 Imitations prohibited; penalty.Unless specifically authorized by the Florida Highway Patrol, a person in the state shall not color or cause to be colored any motor vehicle or motorcycle the same or similar color as the color or colors so prescribed for the Florida Highway Patrol. A person who violates this section or s. 321.02 with respect to uniforms, emblems, motor vehicles and motorcycles commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles shall employ such clerical help and mechanics as may be necessary for the economical and efficient operation of such department.
History.s. 3, ch. 19551, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4151(617); s. 3, ch. 20451, 1941; ss. 24, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 206, ch. 71-136; s. 29, ch. 2010-223.

F.S. 321.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 321.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 321.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 321.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S321.03 - FRAUD-IMPERSON - IMITATE FHP VEHICLE COLORS UNIFORM EMBLEM - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 321.03

Total Results: 12

State of Florida v. Thomas D. Woodel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-06-05

Citation: 145 So. 3d 782, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2014 WL 2532480, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1808

Snippet: he could not form the intent to kill. Id. at 321. 3. Woodel raised the following guilt phase issues:

Langdon v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-01-17

Citation: 947 So. 2d 460, 2006 WL 2819664

Snippet: Futrell, 932 So.2d at 643. Cf. McClain, 629 So.2d at 321. [3] We pause to acknowledge the ear appeal of the

Allen v. Coates

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-10-10

Citation: 661 So. 2d 879, 1995 WL 592308

Snippet: security interests in securities. Subsection 678.321(3), in turn, provides that, subject to two exceptions

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-09-07

Snippet: Beach,363 So.2d 321, 323 (Fla. 1978). 6 Section 166.321(3), Florida Statutes. 7 And see, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla

First Bank v. Rogers NK Seed Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-05-06

Citation: 637 So. 2d 11, 1994 WL 169529

Snippet: required to perfect the security agreement. § 678.321(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989); cf. Finizio v. Shubow, 557

Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-15

Citation: 462 So. 2d 1178, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 189

Snippet: goods would normally have arrived, see U.C.C. § 2-321(3) (1977) (consistent with the nature of a C.I.F.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-08-19

Snippet: appointment. See, s 230.321(2), F.S. Section 230.321(3), F.S., provides that the school board `shall pay

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-07-27

Snippet: investments for the bodies mentioned. Section 665.321(3). Your inquiry specifically concerns investment

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-03-06

Snippet: thereof. Section 665.321(1) id.; see also s. 665.321(3), id., which provides that the provisions of s.

Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-09-24

Citation: 15 So. 2d 175, 153 Fla. 501, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 684

Snippet: in this case are: Brownstin v. Brelle, 101 P.2d 321, 3 Wn.2d 343; Childs v. Smith, 51 Wn. 457, 99 P. 304;

Saliba Et Ux. v. James

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-06-18

Citation: 196 So. 832, 143 Fla. 404

Snippet: required to deliver to him the said sum of $18,321.03 *Page 408 which was impressed with a trust in

Blocker v. Blocker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-10-27

Citation: 137 So. 249, 103 Fla. 285

Snippet: 1917 A. 925; Friedman vs. Friedman, N Y 119 N.E. 321; 3 Thompson R. P. Sec. 2157. A merger takes place