Florida Statute 334.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 334
TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 334.05

334.05 Department headquarters; acquisition of office space.—

(1) The headquarters and general office of the department shall be located at the state capital.

(2) The department may purchase, build, rent, or lease suitable buildings or rooms for its headquarters, general office, branch offices, or division offices and for maintenance yards and rooms for equipment and supplies in other cities and towns of this state as the business of the department may necessitate or require; and payment for the purchase, construction, rental, or lease of such offices shall be made from any funds provided for the maintenance of the department.

History.—s. 4, ch. 29965, 1955; s. 1, ch. 63-330; s. 13, ch. 84-309.

F.S. 334.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 334.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 334.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 334.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 334.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 334.05

Total Results: 20

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES v. J.G., A CHILD AND STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-11-09T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: competency hearing.” Id. at 334. 5 23-2362 District Court

FRANTZY JEAN-MARIE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-01T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: five-year limitation in the RICO statute. See Ch. 77- 334, § 5, Laws of Fla. (enacting RICO statute with same

Walker v. Lamberti

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-03-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 29 So. 3d 1172, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2860, 2010 WL 768758

Snippet: Stat. (2009) (emphasis added)[2]; see also § 397.334(5), Fla. Stat. (2009). *1175 Because the potential

Espinoza v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 821 So. 2d 379, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9673, 2002 WL 1466232

Snippet: utilized. It scored Espinoza to a sentencing range of 334.05 to 556.75 • months or 27.8 years to 46.3 years

Mitchell v. Moore

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-04-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 786 So. 2d 521

Snippet: malpractice actions upheld); McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942). In this case, however, it is

Eller v. Shova

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1993-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 630 So. 2d 537

Snippet: for an injury. See McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942). Similarly, because the limitation

Davey Compressor Co. v. City of Delray Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-01-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 613 So. 2d 60

Snippet: 330 (Fla. 1967) ... D. Dobbs, *62 Remedies at p. 334-5 (1973) ("In addition to the depreciation measure

Shova v. Eller

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-09-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 606 So. 2d 400

Snippet: court noted that in McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942), the court approved the automobile

Antun Investments Corp. v. Ergas

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-09-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 549 So. 2d 706

Snippet: of Torts, § 929 (1979); D. Dobbs, Remedies at p. 334-5 (1973) ("In addition to the depreciation measure

Sasso v. Ram Property Management

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-04-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 431 So. 2d 204

Snippet: judicial forum. See McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942). As a result, subsequent Florida….2d at 4, discussing McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1942) (automobile guest statute

Cauley v. City of Jacksonville

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1981-07-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 403 So. 2d 379

Snippet: 1379 (Fla. 1979); McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1942). Our holding that Kluger

Jetton v. Jacksonville Elec. Auth.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-05-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 399 So. 2d 396

Snippet: .2d at 4, discussing McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1942) (automobile guest statute

Iglesia v. Floran

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1981-02-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 394 So. 2d 994

Snippet: Kluger we stated: In McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942), this Court approved the so-called

Abdin v. Fischer

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-07-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 374 So. 2d 1379

Snippet: Statute"[3] in McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942), because it "merely changed

State Department of Transportation v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-05-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 333 So. 2d 77, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14486

Snippet: Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 334.05, Florida Statutes, absent a waiver by the Appellant

McArthur v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-01-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 306 So. 2d 575

Snippet: McMillan v. Nelson, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1942, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867. However the point there involved was

Kluger v. White

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-07-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 281 So. 2d 1

Snippet: down. We disagree. In McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942), this Court approved the so-called…by § 1, ch. 72-1, Laws of Florida. [9] 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867 (1942). [10] Chapter 440, Florida Statutes

Bochiaro v. Bochiaro

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-07-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 212 So. 2d 882, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5376

Snippet: Nonetheless, in McMillan v. Nelson, 1942, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867, the Supreme Court approved [as sufficient

Hillock v. Heilman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-07-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 2d 544, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3681

Snippet: statute constitutional, McMillan v. Nelson, 149 Fla. 334, 5 So.2d 867, and I am not aware of any reason to

Brooks v. Adams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-11-13T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 115 So. 2d 578

Snippet: C.J.S. Accounting § 41, pages 683, 684; 19 R.C.L. 334-5, par. 108; 36 Am.Jur. 840, 841, par. 301; Williams