Florida Statute 347.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Chapter 347
FERRIES, TOLL BRIDGES, DAMS, AND LOG DITCHES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 347.20

347.20 Vested rights not impaired.—Nothing in this chapter shall affect or impair any right or privilege belonging to any individual or corporation by virtue of any law of this state.

History.—s. 10, ch. 3039, 1877; RS 645; GS 918; RGS 1702; CGL 2753.

F.S. 347.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 347.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 347.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 347.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 347.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 347.20

Total Results: 5

Kalmanson v. Lockett

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-05-23

Citation: 848 So. 2d 374, 2003 WL 21203340

Snippet: Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335, 13 Wall. 335, 347, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1871): [I]t is a general principle of

Kopf v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-02-19

Citation: 379 So. 2d 1327, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15965

Snippet: that the property was already sold and that the $347.20 check that Triplett had sent to Kopf was for closing

The Florida Bar v. Fath

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-02-22

Citation: 368 So. 2d 357, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4581

Snippet: accept any new business. Costs in the amount of $347.20 found by this Court to have been reasonably incurred

Miami Bridge Company v. State R. R. Commission

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-12-19

Citation: 20 So. 2d 356, 155 Fla. 366, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 547

Snippet: rights in the "Venetian Way;" that Section *Page 370 347.20 Fla. Stats. 1941, provides that nothing in this

Willis v. Fowler

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-06-17

Citation: 136 So. 358, 102 Fla. 35

Snippet: Federal Courts. Thus, in Buzard v. Houston, 119 U.S. 347, 20 Law ed. 451, it was held that where a bill in equity