Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 350.123 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 350.123 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 350.123

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES
Chapter 350
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 350.123
350.123 Oaths; depositions; protective orders.The commission may administer oaths, take depositions, issue protective orders, issue subpoenas, and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, documents, and other evidence necessary for the purpose of any investigation or proceeding. Challenges to, and enforcement of, such subpoenas and orders shall be handled as provided in s. 120.569.
History.ss. 3, 6, ch. 80-289; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 6, ch. 87-50; s. 91, ch. 96-410.

F.S. 350.123 on Google Scholar

F.S. 350.123 on Casetext

Amendments to 350.123


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 350.123
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 350.123.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 350.123

Total Results: 20

Schultz v. TM FLORIDA-OHIO REALTY LTD. P'SHIP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-12-15

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1203, 1989 WL 80705

Snippet: Louisville & N. Railroad Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745 (1929), for invalidating a property assessment

Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Green

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-09-02

Citation: 178 So. 2d 355

Snippet: Louisville & N. Railroad Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745 (1929), a suit against the State Comptroller

Collins Investment Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-02-19

Citation: 164 So. 2d 806

Snippet: Louisville and N.R. Co., et al. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745. Where a taxpayer assaulted an assessment

Dade County Land Development Corp. v. Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-11-05

Citation: 157 So. 2d 142

Snippet: 462; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; Devane v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151

Green v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-05-17

Citation: 141 So. 2d 326, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3254

Snippet: action. See Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745 (1929). The complaint here alleges that

Cassady v. Consolidated Naval Stores Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-03-23

Citation: 119 So. 2d 35

Snippet: power, see Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745, 747 — and attempts to delegate to the

Cooper v. Gautier

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-01-25

Citation: 77 So. 2d 615

Snippet: 577; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745, and City of Bradenton v. Seaboard Air

City of Fort Myers v. Heitman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-11-07

Citation: 4 So. 2d 871, 148 Fla. 432

Snippet: Augustine, supra; L. . N. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty, 112 Fla.

Jones v. the City of Arcadia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-06-27

Citation: 3 So. 2d 338, 147 Fla. 571, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1325

Snippet: Louisville Nashville R. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745, was a suit brought by several railroads

Burnett v. Neclar, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-02-27

Citation: 194 So. 324, 142 Fla. 145, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1334

Snippet: relief. See L. N. R. Co., et al., v. Amos,98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; Harvey Bldg. Corp. v. Hannon, 140 Fla

Sproul v. Arundel Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-07-21

Citation: 190 So. 609, 139 Fla. 397, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1678

Snippet: Louisville N. R. Co. v. Amos, supra (98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745). The amended bill shall *Page 399 be

City of Tampa v. Wiley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-04-04

Citation: 188 So. 134, 137 Fla. 126

Snippet: 107 So. 689; L. N. Ry. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; Arundel Corp. v. Sproul, filed January

The Arundel Corp. v. Sproul

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-01-24

Citation: 186 So. 679, 136 Fla. 167, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1533

Snippet: case of Louisville N.R.R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350,123 So. 745, this Court said: "While it is uniformly

City of Marianna v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-04-17

Citation: 169 So. 50, 124 Fla. 145

Snippet: Louisville Nashville R.R. Co. v. Amos,98 Fla. 350, 123 Sou. Rep. 745; Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen,77

Hackney v. McKenny

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-12-06

Citation: 113 Fla. 176, 151 So. 524

Snippet: and approved in L. & N. Ry. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745. The decree appealed from is affirmed

Hackney v. McKenny

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-12-06

Citation: 151 So. 524, 113 Fla. 176, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1707

Snippet: and approved in L. N. Ry. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745. The decree appealed from is affirmed

Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-11-13

Citation: 152 So. 439, 112 Fla. 654, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2332

Snippet: 689; L. . N. R. R. Co.,et al., v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So.2d 745; City of Bradenton v. S. A. L. Ry. Co

City of Tampa v. Colgan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-22

Citation: 149 So. 587, 111 Fla. 538, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2027

Snippet: on other taxpayers. In L. N. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So.2d 745, we said: "The law contemplates that

L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Fed. Land Bank of Columbia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-06-15

Citation: 150 So. 248, 111 Fla. 116, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1916

Snippet: Sou. Rep. 416; L. N. R. Co. v. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 Sou. Rep. 745; Folsom v. Bank of Greenwood, 97

Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-04-04

Citation: 141 So. 153, 104 Fla. 609

Snippet: Hagan,132 So. 676, L. N. R. Co. vs. Amos, 98 Fla. 350, 123 So. 745; State ex rel. Davis v. City of Stuart